{The Open University}

Studying the Renaissance with the Open University

{home}
HOME

{booklet}
TABLE OF CONTENTS

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Looking at the Renaissance

Mysteries and Methods

Analysing texts
Historians have to be suspicious types who, when faced with any kind of evidence, want to know why it was produced, who generated it and what message they were wanting to put across. But the first task to tackle may be of a more fundamental kind - actually reading what may be moth eaten and dog-eared records. In Venice: A Second-hand City? Tricia Allerston speaks about having to master the faded, scrawled over records of the guild of second-hand traders. Her research also alerts us to another problem the historian must contend with, the skewed nature of the evidence. The silences in texts can speak as loudly as what is there. We need to think about whose voices seldom get heard, rarely get recorded? We only see the poor when they are in trouble - borrowing money, receiving charity or when they come up against the criminal law; then they get into the records. Too often the fleeting traces of their existence are in the form of ephemeral records which only occasionally survive. Such are the few remaining the pawn tickets issued by the Banco de Conseio in Venice, which document the traffic in shabby second hand goods, amongst those whose capital resources were pitifully small (Venice: A Second-hand City?). Even those higher up the social scale are not well documented for it is only the rich and powerful who leave good biographical evidence. For example our sole piece of biographical evidence for Gutenberg is a court case. (What did Gutenberg Invent?).

The historian therefore has to be ingenious and may have to use texts for very different purposes to those for which they were made: for example 16th century tax records were not designed to reveal information about family structure; the information has to be teased out of them. Today we want to know about the effectiveness of medical treatment in Renaissance Florence. Two of the most significant sources are the statutes of the hospital of Santa Maria Nuova and the hospital accounts. But, we might ask ourselves, how much insight into the welfare of patients do we get from the regulations and accounts of a modern Hospital Trust? A great deal undoubtedly, but such information certainly has its limitations when assessing delivery on the wards. The accountant is most interested in being answerable to his managers for the funds. And in the case of the statutes drawn up for Santa Maria Nuova, the governors of this Florentine hospital were primarily concerned with being answerable to God for their souls and for the souls of all those who served, or were treated, in the hospital.

Just as the invention of print in the 15th century hugely enhanced the possibilities for scholarship, so today the computer opens up new forms of textual criticism. Using computer enhanced images it has been possible to make a detailed comparison of the typefaces in the Gutenberg Bible with startling results. Universally held assumptions about the way in which movable type was invented have had to be overthrown. This particular historical enquiry has been shared by a physicist, a historian and a craftsman, a reminder that innovative ideas are often the result of co-operating across disciplines. We need also to use texts from many different media. Given the extraordinarily rich visual culture of the Renaissance, fine art and architecture are essential historical texts: so for example, details of the statutes of the hospital of Santa Maria Nuova are confirmed by frescos in the hospital of Santa Maria della Scala in Siena (The Italian Patient). But in using art or literature or archaeology we need to be alert to the conventions and tools of analysis of those media. The historian is indeed a Renaissance man or woman!

Associated image links »

Texts and contexts »