http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/ORO/?p=275 News and opinion from the ORO team Sat, 18 May 2013 10:15:28 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4 http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/ORO/?p=275&cpage=1#comment-11233 Ruth French Tue, 10 May 2011 10:41:51 +0000 http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/ORO/?p=275#comment-11233 To Helen: Probably. But we may be able to make the Accepted Manuscript downloadable and if you include it, we will check the rules before doing so. But any version is better than none - as it will save you time when someone requests a copy (if we aren't able to make it downloadable). To Helen: Probably. But we may be able to make the Accepted Manuscript downloadable and if you include it, we will check the rules before doing so.
But any version is better than none – as it will save you time when someone requests a copy (if we aren’t able to make it downloadable).

]]> http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/ORO/?p=275&cpage=1#comment-11092 Helen King Fri, 06 May 2011 11:14:07 +0000 http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/ORO/?p=275#comment-11092 This is interesting - for example I just had proofs for a journal article (they were bad so they went back!) and there was a box on the offprints-request form if you wanted open access to your article - and a hefty fee! So presuming that this means I can't provide it on the institutional repository? This is interesting – for example I just had proofs for a journal article (they were bad so they went back!) and there was a box on the offprints-request form if you wanted open access to your article – and a hefty fee! So presuming that this means I can’t provide it on the institutional repository?

]]>