Archive for the ‘Mobile course content’ Category

Review of mobile connections: coordinated work around the OU

Thursday, November 24th, 2011

Having completed a talk on a range of mobile-related topics and work delivered, underway or in the proposal stages at the OU – for the IET Technology Coffee Morning series – here’s a slightly amended replay to incorporate demos and overlay prompt slides.

Since chaptering the podcast feed isn’t working as I’d hoped, please use the timecodes below to help find something of specific interest ['scrub' around using the playhead/slider below the video]
UPDATE: The timecodes below are also now hyperlinked to the appropriate segment on the IET YouTube channel as an alternate:
00:01:40 Overview
00:03:27 Student Usage [incl. background/context]
00:16:13 Student survey ’09
00:19:57 Mobile VLE beta [VLE1 on Moodle 1.9 - current, incl. staff demo via goo.gl/TMcPF]
00:26:07 Student survey ’10
00:34:17 Mobile-optimisation: VLE2 [incl. live demos using mobile emulators]
00:50:48 Mobile support [covering some proposals before wider release/publicity]
00:59:07 Mobile coordination [practitioner info, strategy, mobile-friendliness, improved interfaces]
01:08:06 Mobile web applications and third-parties [reflection on OU web-based approach]
01:12:03 Mobile apps & resources [outline of ePub eBook work]
01:14:40 Mobile exposure [proposal for OU Home mobile]

You may also find the prompt slides useful to identify an area of interest [via goo.gl/yjAkT]:

Mobile VLE – v2 wrap-up & wider context

Friday, November 4th, 2011

In the last 4 posts, I have given an overview of new features and enhancements along with some rationale as part of the move from mobile-optimising Moodle 1.9 to 2.1 at the OU. There are a select number of modules that have now migrated to OU VLE2 in the October/November presentation period and more will follow through to February 2012 and beyond. Currently our students will continue on the same basis as before when using mobile – that is on an (open) beta trial with opportunities for feedback and some further enhancements due in December.

In parallel, work continues on proposals to better unify the OU mobile presence from the top down, which will be discussed in the upcoming IET Tech talk, but also mocked up in outline using Google Sites – all subject to approval. Part of this will be to offer commonly-accessible guidance and provide self-help where possible for novices and less familiar users of the (OU) mobile web – again an approach expected to be trialled in early 2012.

Other features of mobile delivery include the extensive work now underway in providing better solutions to ‘long-form’ content previously available only in print. Early prototyping using Structured Content materials in OpenLearn have yielded a range of more interactive and enhanced eBooks in the ePub format [currently implemented for iBooks, with Kindle on its way]. This is a precursor to being able to provide similar materials to students, accessed through OU VLE2 – with some early trialling underway in the OU Business School, Faculty of Business & Law.

Mobile VLE v2 – Learning content

Tuesday, November 1st, 2011

In line with the OU push to implement more of the curriculum narrative, scaffolding, signposting and activities online – rather than solely relying on a mixed blend of physical artefacts – the central study planner is a key route through a module. As mentioned in the previous post, this is carried through to the mobile view and in adopting Moodle 2.1 we are now using sub-pages to better structure what was essentially flat navigation [albeit with some inventive workarounds involving 'stealthing'] to a number of assets.

At the same time, while resource pages and PDFs of printed material remain, much of the OU resources have moved to being implemented according to structured content methods – which give rise to many outputs – web content being the main one available on the VLE. [Alternative formats are increasingly available, with personal preferences now simplifying the range of options]
Mobile optimisation of structured content is demonstrated in the screenshots below, with the ability to access the contents page for navigation:

Where possible, some of the more complex layouts including images, tables and sidenotes have been reflowed to better fit the smaller [default portrait] screen of a mobile device. Also similar to the desktop view, the document also indicates what section you last read [and this is carried through to whatever browser you use]:

At this time, some of the interactives, in particular Flash assets, may not work on some devices, but work is now underway to implement HTML5 versions of much of our rich media, including audiovisual clips. An additional feature that can be turned on by the curriculum team is to link (unfamiliar) words in text to the glossary, which has also been optimised in the mobile view. The glossary can also be accessed independently if made available as a resource.

Mobile VLE: covering the required featureset

Monday, August 9th, 2010

Since I started this latest series of blog articles with reference to the student survey that gave us the indicators for priority areas for development, I’ll wrap up by going back to this (originally referred to in the student rating blog post).

So, in order of priority for development, now complete:

  • Assessment – scores available more rapidly on StudentHome mobile portal as a result of parallel development
  • Messages – course messages and quick view of forums with unread posts on ‘launchpad’ view, ForumNG also optimised
  • Tasks – ‘tick-boxes’ can be used to keep track of progress, preserved on both mobile and desktop views
  • Planner – the course planner ‘launchpad’ view is optimised to display the current week, but also a quick view of 3, 5 or 9 weeks of activity, depending on course settings. There is also an entire-course view available, and courses without calendar weeks display in full
  • Resources – resource pages and the resource block are optimised and where mobile devices can handle downloadable resource files these will work in addition to Structured Content

To complete the collaborative tools provision, we also included OUWikis and OUBlogs which cross over between tasks, activities and resources.

Remaining areas for development:

  • Calendar – on hold subject to work with Google Apps
  • Search – will follow from a separate integrated search project
  • Glossary – should be able to be done in next development round
  • Objectives – learning objectives are usually implemented as resources, but could be drawn out subject to further verification

A follow up student survey will be available on StudentHome mobile, as before, once the successful release of these new features have been made available in September 2010, where we will also query further the demand for quizzes, eBooks and mobile apps.
In conclusion, many sincere thanks go to Anthony Forth in being able to bring some of this mobile development work ahead of schedule, and for his thoroughness in checking through the latest additions to our mobile-optimised featureset.

Mobile VLE: rendering Structured Content

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

In addition to the previously optimised Resource Pages, Structured Content is the primary means of managing and creating content to be rendered onto course/module websites, as well as ‘alternative formats’ that are increasingly available [PDFs, DAISY, ePub, MP3, Word, Print].

The main work required here was to establish a means for the navigation to be separated but easily accessible from the content, which was achieved as illustrated below:

While most of the Structured Content web views render faithfully (apart from Glossary, not covered this time), more work will need to be undertaken in resolving drag-and-drop activities and alternates to Flash in some cases. Embedded audiovisual content will not display in the player, on screen, but the assets are also hyperlinked so that a more appropriate app can handle these.

In addition to this and the alternative format work going on in parallel (particularly that in improving ‘rich media’ ePub eBooks), there has also been some prototyping work on Android to establish packages of HTML content for syncing offline into an app – which required further work on handling audiovisual content. More on this later, as an update to a prior post on the ‘shell application’, also covered in Anthony Forth’s UK MoodleMoot presentation [see MoodleNews for more].

Mobile roundup – audio, eBooks, apps and coordination

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

We’re due for a bit of an update on some of the related project strands I think, so here’s an attempt to give quick overviews on what’s happening.

L120 research study into use of Learnosity Voice Response service: The findings and discussion around this innovative use of audio eAssessment have been well received at a number of internal and external sessions. Key elements of student feedback include the “authentic” aspect of working with audio stimuli/prompts and oral responses in this way, the ability to effectively construct a dialogue between pre-recorded audio interweaved between student responses in playback, and the potential to compare with model answers.

Work is now underway by colleagues in FELS to move the development onwards from research study to pilot; from formative to summative assessment (tutor feedback online); to work on OU integration with eAssessment colleagues and Exams; providing many modes of access – mobile phone, landline, Skype, mobile app (iPhone/iPod Touch), online, and to evaluate possibilities in other discipline areas. LIO are now supporting the service licence costs of the pilots (only) as mainstreaming evaluation work is undertaken by other areas in the OU.

ePub eBook technical evaluation and format development: Work has proceeded more sporadically in this area around other priorities and a shifting external market, but is now at a stage to better complement other work being undertaken by LTS in developing a multiple ‘alternative format’ pipeline system that will deliver many different format options. The main challenge remains to ably check that the ePub ‘standard’ is actually delivered consistently across devices/apps and in how to provide instructions or canned text prompts where Structured Content includes online activities.

Mobile ‘shell’ application develelopment: Initial prototyping work to define a method for packaging web content and synchronise with (initially Android) devices is nearing completion. Further consultation will follow in providing packages of learning content for students to use as part of a trial late in 2010. LIO will continue to resource development and exploration in this area.

Mobile coordination website: Commissioned design work is now progressing in bringing together content relating to all aspects of working with mobile technologies at the Open University. The intention is to cover projects researching the pedagogy and impact of mobile learning, pilot projects offering skills development or other aspects of learner support in mobile friendly formats. In addition, provision will be made for advice on using mobile technologies at work (e.g. connecting to the OU’s network or email systems) and updates about the relevant university mobile strategies.

The site will encompass both formal and informal approaches to exploring and working with mobile technologies, primarily providing a space to aggregate content currently available in multiple locations across the university. This will be achieved in part by collating, cross-linking and embedding content from other social/media sites and project pages, including Delicious and Cloudworks.

Some parts of the web site, where appropriate, will be visible to the public, enabling us to raise awareness of the OU’s efforts in this area, but much of the information will only be visible to staff (internal and Associate Lecturers) who are logged in via their OUCU. All pages will be optimised for mobiles and searchable via the intranet. To be discussed as part of the next Mobile SIGUPDATE: Now called mobisite

And finally…last month StudentHome mobile hit a bit of a milestone with over 10,000 unique student visits via mobile devices. So more revisions and development to follow I think!

A summary of some of the work undertaken during 2009 is also now available as a set of case studies in an article in RCETJ, following last year’s Handheld Learning conference.

Learning Innovation Strategy Group update

Tuesday, December 1st, 2009

This morning saw the latest OUVLE update released and tomorrow is the next meeting of LISG, for which I’ve prepared this short update:

Work on the Mobile VLE has progressed in terms of implementing design work onto the basic (alpha) provision currently hidden from users – but accessible via adding &mobile=1 onto course URLs for multi-platform device testing. The next phase of development to apply a mobile optimised view of other VLE pages, including resource pages and selected tools is also underway for a beta technical release from March 2010.

Future work aiming for June 2010 is to further extend the optimised Mobile VLE toolset and reposition the left-hand navigation on subsidiary pages. Further integrations are expected with Structured Content delivery – so that ePub formats can be offered in addition to printable views, and exploratory work taken forward with implementing course Structured Content within an OU mobile application. Anthony Forth is taking this aspect of development work forward.

UPDATE: A request has been made to the Structured Content Group to implement work in parallel for June 2010, so that initially ePub files can be manually created and uploaded to the VLE to offer as an alternative format, aiming towards automation.

Now that this meeting and another on ePub/eBooks have taken place, I’ve amended this post, with a further update to follow shortly.

Supplementary activities

Tuesday, November 24th, 2009

At the end of another month more Mobile activities have started up and there should be some progress (at least internally) with the Mobile VLE from the next release date of 1st Dec 09.

There have been some useful synergies between the work our XSLT contractor Lee Austin has been doing and the Development Advisor for Editing and Structured Content (Gerald Schmidt) in LTS has also being doing with regard to ePub and a pipelining process being implemented largely for DAISY work. A further scoping meeting for development and embedding will take place at the start of December.

In a newer, but related area for development, it’s been decided initially to give more direction to a cross-platform mobile application using WebKit. So not only will an OU teaching and learning ‘umbrella’ app be created, but also that some of the modules that can be added will contain structured content that will include more interactive activities available to use offline (not currently possible with standard eBook formats).

Update on eBook technical evaluation and coding

Thursday, July 30th, 2009

Here’s the second part of the project update:

As the first in a series of explorations to evaluate how to package VLE content and resources for offline usage (or with poor connectivity), the latest developments in structured content provided an opportunity to investigate technical requirements for other formats to supplement current web delivery (and print view). This is also seen to complement work underway by the Digital Audio Project (Disabled Student Services) for synthetic voice-read course texts and DAISY format development.

Initial format evaluation [summary available on project blog] identified Mobipocket as a more feature-rich format that is already popular amongst mobile (and desktop) users. Following on from development work for that format, the open-source ePub (or Open eBook) format would follow most naturally, with many methods common to both.

As a result, the LIO contractor worked on XSLT coding from OU intermediate XML, working through all of the elements of the OU schema with the aim to provide a best-attempt approach, rather than handcrafting for each case. Refinements are expected in an iterative process, and decisions remain to be made on what ‘canned text’ for example indicates where there are activities that need to be completed online, within the narrative.

Since the initial coding work, it has however become apparent that Amazon’s purchase of the Mobipocket platform has frozen some development of client applications, and the future of the format is in question alongside Kindle (still unavailable outside US). Aside from creating a few eBook samples, development work has now been redeployed to providing ePub standard format.

Summary of eBook formats – and initial decision to pursue Mobipocket

Friday, July 3rd, 2009

I’m including the summary below from our XML/XSLT contractor Lee Austin, who is coming to the end of the initial development of transformation code from OU Intermediate XML for our structured content into the Mobipocket format. This will be followed by work on the ePub (open eBook) format, which is closely related to the Mobi format.

If colleagues have edited structured content source material (in XML or DOC) that has been produced for the VLE, please get in touch as we are keen to try the transformation on many different content samples.

Please note that we have decided to follow the most interoperable approach, particularly in where eBook formats/software have been developed for devices rather than desktops (contrasting with Adobe PDF and many other ‘multimedia’ eBook options).

Different eBook formatsfrom Wikipedia’s Comparison of e-book formats

PML feature summary

  • established language and use – been around for 10 years
  • simple and elegant specification
  • uses its own mark-up language (PML – Peanut Mark-up Language)
  • does a good job at producing simple eBooks
  • as PML was written for the PALM PDA, formatting features of other devices are not necessarily supported
  • Level A feature set – feature set lacking

Mobi feature summary

  • established language and use – has been around the same sort of time as PML
  • most widely used eBook format – and therefore have the biggest audience (Amazon format based on this)
  • was originally an extension of the PALMdoc format
  • specification is an extension to the HTML 3.2 standard
  • more challenging eBooks creation due to the number of tags and options compared with PML
  • Level AA feature set – provides options and features that can produce an eBooks more suited to the OU’s content

ePub feature summary

  • emerging specification – not widely used
  • based on open and current standards – XML/XHTML/CSS
  • much faster hardware needed – due to the amount of data loaded and parsed (no limits)
  • smaller audience
  • Level AAA feature set – clearly provides many formatting options and features

There are a number of reasons as to why the mobi specification was chosen for the proof of concept project:

  1. PML – whilst it is simple and elegant and would be easy to transform the OU’s content into simple eBooks, it does not provide the necessary formatting and feature options needed. It is better suited to simple eBooks.
  2. Mobi is currently the most widely used eBook format.
  3. Mobi has a feature set full enough to produce the formatting needed to suit most of the OU’s content.
  4. Mobi is in the middle in terms of standards and relationships between the different 3 formats.
  5. ePub – provides a extended feature rich specification, however, it is relatively new to the scene and is not as widely used.

Switch to our mobile site