Innovating Pedagogy

The recently published Innovating Pedagogy report explores contemporary and innovative forms of teaching, learning and assessment for an interactive world, to guide teachers and policy makers in productive innovation.

Here are the different sections of the report:

http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/innovating/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/innovating_pedagogy13-211x300.jpg

http://www.open.ac.uk/blogs/innovating/wp-content/uploads/2012/06/innovating_pedagogy13-211x300.jpg

Share
Posted in education, research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Athabasca Landing

Terry Anderson is currently visiting us here in IET and he just gave a brief presentation on the ‘Athabasca Landing‘, which is the virtual learning environment and social network that supports their students.  These are my notes from the session…

http://athabascalanding.athabascau.ca/images/cover/hal.jpg

Athabasca Landing

Athabasca Landing‘  was the original name for Athabasca, which is 190km north of Evantown.  The university is the largest master of distance learning programme and the only USA accredited university in Canada.  (Approximately 50% of students are registered at other universities and take courses at Athabasca through credit transfer schemes which are more common in Canada.)  Of 150 faculty, only 8 live in Athabasca itself.

The ‘Landing’ is a toolset for sharing and communication as well as a social network.  It might be thought of as a ‘walled garden with windows’, a user-owned space which is shut off from outside influence (no adverts, links to vendors, etc).   Unlike Moodle, users are not assigned levels of influence: anyone can do anything.

The pedagogical rationale for the site is that undergraduate programmes are followed at the students own pace and it cannot be assumed that there will be a cohort who move through the programme together.  Landing supports ‘beyond the course’ interaction and integration among students who are encouraged to take ownership of the space to create co-operative and collaborative opportunities for learning (in accordance with Connectivist pedagogies).  Because staff are also distributed, Landing supports them in making connections.  (Most administrative systems are quite inflexible, having been designed for closed and controlled users, audiences and processes.)

There are currently 4488 users, but uptake is perhaps being slowed by the functionality now available on Moodle, email, Facebook or academia.edu.

When you log in, you can see site statistics, etc and the feed from those individuals who you follow.  There is a Twitter equivalent (‘The Wire’) and a number of special interest groups which may or may not be based on a course or course activity.  One can search by tags, access an event calendar, bookmarks, wikis, Google Gadgets, forums, and various widgets.  One can also follow individuals of interest and publish blog posts through the platform.

A lot of students choose not to use the platform, but many also find it a good antidote to the relative quietness of the Athabasca campus.  This is also the thinking behind a lot of the activities that take place within the OU’s own virtual learning environment (which is a custom version of Moodle). Martin Weller noted that on some OU courses the forums may be relatively inactive while extensive discussion takes place on Facebook.

Share
Posted in education | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

#opened12 Reading Group – sign up here!

Following on from discussions around #opened12 and David Kernohan’s suggestion of a parrallel between Newman‘s approach to education and theories of Bildung, I’ve a mind to see whether there’s interest in a virtual reading group. We could start with The Idea of a University.

Some people have already expressed an interest on Twitter…

Jonathan Shaw (@time_motion)
John Robertson (@kavubob)
Chris Lott (@lottruminates)

If you’re also interested, add your details to the comments below and I’ll get back to you all with some sort of plan!

Other things we could read that have been mentioned to me over the last couple of days…

Bateson: ‘Steps to an Ecology of Mind
Orlikowski: ‘Improvising Organizational Transformation over Time:
A Situated Change Perspective

Share
Posted in admin, education, research | Tagged , , , , , | 1 Comment

My #opened12 slides

Here are my slides for today’s presentation.  You can listen to the live audio at http://openedconference.org/2012/program/day-2/day2-1330-c485/.


Share
Posted in education, oer, philosophy | Tagged , , , , , , , , | 2 Comments

Live blogging #opened12

I’ve set up a Cloudworks cloudscape for http://openedconference.org/ at Open Education: Beyond Content (http://cloudworks.ac.uk/cloudscape/view/2437).  Feel free to follow events as they unfold there, join the discussion and help to archive conference!

Share
Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Scoop.It Activity!

My Scoop.It activity has gone through the roof in the last 48 hours. I would normally expect maybe half a dozen rescoops in a week and I’ve had forty in the last two days. Here are just the email notifications from this morning…

Scoop.It Notifications

Scoop.It Notifications

The posts which seem to be getting the most attention are 50 top sources of free elearning courses and Transformative or just flashy educational tools? Between them, they perhaps sum up the interest and ambivalence that surrounds online education…

Share
Posted in technology | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , | 1 Comment

Hornsey: research & self-consciousness

‎What do you do with a quote when you’re not sure what else to do with it?  Stick it on your blog, of course… there’s an interesting parallel to the Friere/Fromm quote here and also some overlap the forthcoming paper on OER and Bildung that I am writing with Markus Deimann.  Thanks to Matthew Bowman for drawing it to my attention.

“We regard it as absolutely basic that research should be an organic part of art and design education. No system devoted to the fostering of creativity can function properly unless original work and thought are constantly going on within it, unless it remains on an opening frontier of development. As well as being on general problems of art and design (techniques, aesthetics, history, etc), such research activity must also deal with the educational process itself . . . It must be the critical self-consciousness of the system . . . Nothing condemns the old regime more radically than the minor, precarious part research played in it. It is intolerable that research should be seen as a luxury, or a rare privilege.”

Students and Staff of Hornsey College of Art (eds.), The Hornsey Affair (Harmondworth: Penguin, 1969), pp. 38-39.

For a bit of context, see What happened at Hornsey in May 1968.

Share
Posted in research | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Freire & Fromm on ‘Necrophily’

Just reading Pedagogy of the Oppressed and had to make a note of this quote.  Freire encourages us to adopt the general thesis that “only through communication can hold meaning” and suggests that in pedagogical situations the teacher may only authenticate their own thoughts through the thoughts of their students.  Hence “authentic thinking, thinking that is concerned about reality, does not take place in ivory tower isolation”.

When pedagogy is based on a false, objectified or instrumental understanding of human beings, Freire contends, it cannot promote what Fromm terms ‘biophily’ (deep connection to life) but instead promotes its opposite.  Fromm’s description of this phenomena is strikingly Hegelian.

“When life is characterized by growth in a structured, functional manner, the necrophilous person loves all that does not grow, that is mechanical.  The necrophilous person is driven by the desire to transform the organic into the inorganic, to approach life mechanically, as if all living persons were things…  The necrophilous person can relate to an object – a flower or a person – only if he possesses it [...] if he loses possession he loses contact with the world… He loves control, and in the act of controlling he kills life.”

This seems distinct from, say, Freud’s depiction of the death-drive termed Thanatos.  If anything, it reflects a particular form of reification or category mistake.  But what I find more interesting is Freire’s way of describing this in an educational context.  Freire (perhaps not unproblematically) co-identifies impaired communication, dominance of thought in education and the necrophilic attitude.

“Oppression – overwhelming control – is necrophilic; it is nourished by love of death, not life.  The banking concept of education, which serves the interest of oppression, is also necrophilic.  Based on a mechanistic, static, naturalistic, spatialized view of consciousness, it transforms students into receiving objects.  It attempts to control thinking and action, leads men and women to adjust to the world, and inhibits their creative power.”

Freire, P. (1996) Pedagogy of the Oppressed. Penguin, London. p.58

EDIT: Someone else has also picked up on this and written something a bit more developed

Share
Posted in pedagogy, philosophy, research | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Recording: Cambridge 2012

More media now online… you can watch the presentation that myself and Patrick McAndrew gave at Cambridge 2012: Innovation and Impact – Openly Collaborating to Enhance Education back in April at http://presentations.ocwconsortium.org/uk2012_329_learning_lessons_of_openness/.

Share
Posted in oer, research | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Recording: Madrid 2012

Video recordings from the 6th International Conference on the Philosophy of Computer Games: The Nature of Player Experience, on the January 29, 30 and 31, 2012 in Madrid are now online at http://arsgames.net/blog/?p=2546.  My presentation can be found at http://blip.tv/arsgames/8420_robert_farrow-5941907.

Share
Posted in research | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment