The Open UniversitySkip to content

July 1st, 2011SocialLearn@EdMedia2011

This week sees one of the largest gatherings of the technology-enhanced learning community at EdMedia2011, the World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications, (Lisbon, June 27 – July 1).

The Open University’s Andrew Law (Director, Open Media) is keynoting today on the topic of Bringing the Social into Learning with Open Media, in which he will present a range of the OU’s strategic initiatives and projects at the crucial intersection of Open/Social/Learning, part of which is of course SocialLearn.

Here’re some follow-up resources for those of you interested to know more:

SocialLearn beta site currently deployed with selected OU communities and with research partners. Watch the movies, and register your interest in learning more as a learner, educator or researcher.

Thanks: http://twitpic.com/5jfnmc

Social Learning Analytics — part of the fast emerging field of Learning Analytics – we’re helping to run the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (Vancouver, April 2012)

Navigating and Discovering Educational Materials through Visual Similarity Search — SocialLearn was in another EdMedia session, where Suzanne Little described how KMi’s multimedia R&D is now feeding through into an innovative SocialLearn tool

Researcher in Learning Analytics & Recommender Services — We’re hiring! Right now we need a top calibre technically-oriented postdoctoral person. Another similar research position will be advertised shortly, focused on social learners’ user experience and the application of the learning sciences — watch this space!

SocialLearn provides an ideal testbed for researching online social learning in diverse contexts. To explore the possibility of joining us a research partner, feel free to contact Simon Buckingham Shum informally with some background on your interests.

June 14th, 2011Social Learning Analytics

This morning on the opening day of the CALRG 2011 Conference, we presented some of the recent thinking we’ve been doing on learning analytics, specifically in a social learning context.

A technical report setting out the line of argument in more detail…

Buckingham Shum, S. and Ferguson, R. (2011). Social Learning Analytics. Available as: Technical Report KMI-11-01, Knowledge Media Institute, The Open University, UK. http://kmi.open.ac.uk/publications/pdf/kmi-11-01.pdf

Abstract: We propose that the design and implementation of effective Social Learning Analytics presents significant challenges and opportunities for both research and enterprise, in three important respects. The first is the challenge of implementing analytics that have pedagogical and ethical integrity, in a context where power and control over data is now of primary importance. The second challenge is that the educational landscape is extraordinarily turbulent at present, in no small part due to technological drivers. Online social learning is emerging as a significant phenomenon for a variety of reasons, which we review, in order to motivate the concept of social learning, and ways of conceiving social learning environments as distinct from other social platforms. This sets the context for the third challenge, namely, to understand different types of Social Learning Analytic, each of which has specific technical and pedagogical challenges. We propose an initial taxonomy of five types. We conclude by considering potential futures for Social Learning Analytics, if the drivers and trends reviewed continue, and the prospect of solutions to some of the concerns that institution-centric learning analytics may provoke.

Here in Banff, we’re wrapping up the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge in the outstanding Banff Centre. I have to say that I’ve also never been anywhere so cold, and this is the only conference where they provide free tissues on every delegate table!

It’s been an exciting event to be at, with a tangible sense that this is only going to get bigger, and fast. More reflections on this later, but here are the slides from the session we ran yesterday, with a focus on how analytics might help us understand not just the quantitative analytics on online discourse (e.g. how many people are engaging in discourse, and how often, etc), but what’s the quality of that discourse? A lot of learning concerns making your thinking visible through the way in which you construct your contributions, whether to a forum, or an essay or article. As confirmed by extensive research, learners have to be inducted into the practices of scholarly writing as defined by their particular discipline – they must learn to show, quite explictly, the line of argument or nature of contribution and how it connects constructively to what has been said previously, either by a peer, or in the literature.

This strand of our work in SocialLearn might go under the heading of discourse-centric learning analytics. In the first approach, we seek to detect quality discourse in textchat, and in the second, we deploy a platform for structured deliberation.

Ferguson, R. and Buckingham Shum, S. (2011). Learning Analytics to Identify Exploratory Dialogue within Synchronous Text Chat. Proc. 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. Feb. 27-Mar 1, 2011, Banff [PDF]

Abstract. While generic web analytics tend to focus on easily harvested quantitative data, Learning Analytics will often seek qualitative understanding of the context and meaning of this information. This is critical in the case of dialogue, which may be employed to share knowledge and jointly construct understandings, but which also involves many superficial exchanges. Previous studies have validated a particular pattern of ‘exploratory dialogue’ in learning environments to signify sharing, challenge, evaluation and careful consideration by participants. This study investigates the use of sociocultural discourse analysis to analyse synchronous text chat during an online conference. Key words and phrases indicative of exploratory dialogue were identified in these exchanges, and peaks of exploratory dialogue were associated with periods set aside for discussion and keynote speakers. Fewer individuals posted at these times, but meaningful discussion outweighed trivial exchanges. If further analysis confirms the validity of these markers as learning analytics, they could be used by recommendation engines to support learners and teachers in locating dialogue exchanges where deeper learning appears to be taking place. Slides: Learning Analytics & Exploratory Dialogue [PPTX/PDF]

De Liddo, A., Buckingham Shum, S., Quinto, I., Bachler, M. and Cannavacciuolo, L. (2011). Discourse-Centric Learning Analytics. Proc. 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge. Feb. 27-Mar 1, 2011, Banff. Eprint: http://oro.open.ac.uk/25829

Abstract. Drawing on sociocultural discourse analysis and argumentation theory, we motivate a focus on learners’ discourse as a promising site for identifying patterns of activity which correspond to meaningful learning and knowledge construction. However, software platforms must gain access to qualitative information about the rhetorical dimensions to discourse contributions to enable such analytics. This is difficult to extract from naturally occurring text, but the emergence of more-structured annotation and deliberation platforms for learning makes such information available. Using the Cohere web application as a research vehicle, we present examples of analytics at the level of individual learners and groups, showing conceptual and social network patterns, which we propose as indicators of meaningful learning. Slides: Discourse-Centric Learning Analytics [PPTX/PDF]

October 11th, 2010OpenEd2010 and Drumbeat

Simon Buckingham Shum from the SL team will be in Barcelona next month for the co-located Open Education Conference and Mozilla Drumbeat Festival.

Here’s a preview of the article on SocialLearn that we’ll present at OpenEd, reviewing some of the design rationale for SocialLearn, currently in internal testing here at Open U:

Buckingham Shum, S. and Ferguson, R. (2010). Towards a social learning space for open educational resources. OpenEd 2010: Seventh Annual Open Education Conference, 2-4 Nov 2010, Barcelona. Eprint: http://oro.open.ac.uk/23351

Look forward to seeing you there, and look out at Drumbeat for the related demos of Cohere (opening night Science Fair), a social web annotation and knowledge mapping tool tuned for inquiry, sensemaking and learning. This forms part of our thinking on what a Collective Intelligence infrastructure might be not only for social learners, but also as a resilience platform for stakeholders in the open educational resources movement:

Buckingham Shum, S. and De Liddo, A. (2010). Collective intelligence for OER sustainability. OpenEd 2010: Seventh Annual Open Education Conference, 2-4 Nov 2010, Barcelona. Eprint: http://oro.open.ac.uk/23352

YouTube replay

June 21st, 2010EDUCAUSE webinar

On June 7, I gave an EDUCAUSE webinar, in which I told the story that’s slowly emerging from thinking around Social Learning, Sensemaking Capacity, and Collective Intelligence. I follow through some of the forces that are shaping the social learning contours of the emerging landscape, specifically around the need for sensemaking when confronted with increasingly complex, unfamiliar dilemmas.

Many thanks to the EDUCAUSE-ELI team for the chance to share this work. Some of the videos of tools, which I didn’t get time to show, are blogged here. The slides are below, and on EDUCAUSE [or here as PDF], but the full replay only to EDUCAUSE members for a few months.


© 2008 SocialLearn | iKon Wordpress Theme by Windows Vista Administration | Powered by Wordpress
This blog is protected by dr Dave\'s Spam Karma 2: 12764 Spams eaten and counting...