2012 was a real breakthrough for victims who experienced child sexual abuse. Since the Jimmy Scandal in 2012, there has been a 71% increase in the number of reports<\/a> of child sexual abuse. Nonetheless, it is disturbing to recognise the scale of the VIP sexual abuse inquiry<\/a> which has highlighted a huge number of well-known, powerful people under investigation that includes 76 politicians, 135 TV film or radio figures, 43 from the music industry and 7 sports stars (and 9 sports venues). Whilst it seems shocking that many seemed to have been abused in settings where these vulnerable people should have been safe (e.g. schools, sports, religious institutions) perhaps it\u2019s worth considering how these environments (e.g. sport) are conducive to such forms of abuse and exploitation as well.<\/p>\n The World of Sport<\/strong><\/p>\n We only have to go as far as the recent FIFA arrests to recognise that sport is not the clean, fair, functional, happy, hyped up field it presents itself as so it\u2019s becoming increasingly important to place these institutional structures under scrutiny. Indeed, a large body of research1-5<\/sup> suggests that competitive sporting environments provide a unique socio-cultural context that offers possibilities for sexual abuse and exploitation to take place. In sport, the specific danger is the amount of power<\/em> invested in the coach. Coaches (as perpetrators) can impose their version of reality on athletes (as victims) and isolate them from potential sources of support within that reality by controlling the psychological environment through direct emotional manipulation, psychological abuse, and the creation of a highly volatile, psychologically abusive training environment.6,7<\/sup> Indeed, Brackenridge and Fasting (2005)8<\/sup> comment on previous studies on what’s known as the \u2018grooming process\u2019 in sport:<\/p>\n The previous studies suggest that, for the abuser, grooming is a conscious strategy. The athlete, on the other hand, is usually an unwitting party to the gradual erosion of the interpersonal boundary between her and the coach. The power afforded to the coach in his position of authority offers an effective alibi or camouflage for grooming and abuse. Incremental shifts in the boundary between coach and athlete go unnoticed, unrecognized or unreported by the athlete until the point where she has become completely entrapped and is unable to resist his advances. (p. 37)<\/p>\n A recent paper9<\/sup> presents a story about \u201cBella\u201d and the dynamic relationships between three main types of coaches.4<\/sup> These types were:<\/p>\n Sometimes, stories in the news offer us some comfort that perpetrators of child sex abuse are \u2018abnormal\u2019 \u2013 \u2018mad\u2019, \u2018bad\u2019 and even monsters. However, this makes them harder to identify. This doesn\u2019t sit very comfortably with the large scale pattern of child abuse. Whilst the moral panics sell newspapers, it does point to some difficulties of how we can make sense of child abuse. How can abuse be so widespread if perpetrated by an \u2018abnormal\u2019 minority? The idea of a cover up of widespread abuse by public figures and people we trust is certainly insidious but it is all too easy to talk of these events as committed by people who are \u2018deviant\u2019. The panic and fear this creates often results in a restriction of where young people can go and what they can do, particularly for girls and women.<\/p>\n To make sense of child abuse, perhaps we need to think through what allows young people to be treated as \u2018vulnerable\u2019. The answer is undoubtedly complicated but the unequal position they find themselves in relation to all adults is something that deserves some focus.10,11<\/sup> This existing power between victim and perpetrator (e.g. athlete and coach) occurs in the context of structural power relations within institutions (e.g. sport) which often operates using top down hierarchical forms of authority. In this sense, children are subjected to overlapping forms of power that makes them vulnerable.<\/p>\n Britain has turned a blind eye to child sexual abuse for too long in previous years but so have structures that serve to protect institutions; these structures, rules, procedures and norms of violence towards women within institutions<\/a> (e.g. sport) need to be subjected to scrutiny as well for things to really change.12<\/sup><\/p>\n\n
![\"Sexual](\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/OU-Sport\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/06\/Sexual-abuse-in-sport-pic-300x168.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\n