{"id":1399,"date":"2013-04-05T08:22:41","date_gmt":"2013-04-05T08:22:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/?p=1399"},"modified":"2013-05-16T20:00:47","modified_gmt":"2013-05-16T20:00:47","slug":"automatic-marking-of-essays","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/?p=1399","title":{"rendered":"Automatic marking of essays"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I am grateful to Carol Bailey (see previous <a href=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/?p=1394\">post<\/a>) who, following a discussion over lunch, sent me a link to an extremely interesting paper:<\/p>\n<p>Vojak, C., Kline, S., Cope, B., McCarthey, S. and Kalantzis, M. (2011) New Spaces and Old Places: An Analysis of Writing Assessment Software. <em>Computers and Composition, <\/em>28, 97-111.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Capture1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-1401\" title=\"Capture\" src=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Capture1-300x244.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"244\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Capture1-300x244.png 300w, https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/04\/Capture1.png 520w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>This is about computer-based marking of essays. I should start by pointing out that this is not an area that I know a huge amount about &#8211; the issues are\u00a0surprisingly different from those in the computer-based marking of short-answer questions. &#8216;E-rater&#8217; is perhaps the best-known essay-marking software, but there are lots of others, some of which are discussed in the following review articles:<\/p>\n<p>Dikli, S. (2006) An overview of automated scoring of essays. <em>Journal of Technology, Learning and Assessment<\/em>, 5(1).<\/p>\n<p>Valenti, S. &amp; Neri, F. &amp; Cucchiarelli, A. (2003). An overview of current research on automated essay grading. <em>Journal of Information Technology Education<\/em>, 2, 319-330.<\/p>\n<p>Some of the systems mark for content, some mark for essay-writing style, and some mark for both. As I understand it, when marking for content, this is in some senses easier to do than when you are marking an essay than when you are marking a shorter answer. In a short answer things like word order and negation can be extremely important (see my previous post on this <a href=\"hhttps:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/?p=541ttp:\/\/\">here<\/a>). However, in longer answers, if all the (probably large number) of keywords or their synonyms are there, then the essay-writer is likely to have right idea.<\/p>\n<p>I don&#8217;t pretend to begin to understand the technologies used to mark writing style. I&#8217;m sure that they are very clever and they appear to have good success rates i.e. the things that they measure are good proxies for a the things that human markers of essays look for.<\/p>\n<p>However Vojak et al (2003) raise an extremely important question: should we be asking our students to write for a computer rather than for a human marker? This question has philosophical overtones, and again I rapidly get out of my depth. It is an interesting point, given that writing is essentially a social activity.<\/p>\n<p>More pragmatically, there are cases where people have succeeded in fooling an essay-marking system by submitting a gibberish essay and getting a good mark. Now, one of the things I learnt early in my e-assessment career (from my &#8216;mentor&#8217; Phil Butcher) was that students don&#8217;t try to fool the system &#8211; this is something that academics do! Over the years I have found Phil&#8217;s advice on this point to be absolutely right. However, if word were to get out that a class&#8217;s essays were being marked on the strength of, say, the number of commas they contained, I, guess, I, wouldn&#8217;t, be, very, happy.<\/p>\n<p>Returning to the more philosophical, I&#8217;d also feel uneasy if I felt that my carefully crafted words were being &#8216;read&#8217; by a computer not a human. Despite the fact that I blog primarily to keep my own thoughts in order, as I write I do feel that I am trying to convince some flesh-and-bones reader of what I am trying to say, and to engage in debate. Is it odd that I feel like that, given that I am very happy to mark our students&#8217; sentence-long answers automatically, and to give them computer-generated feedback. To get out of the logical hole I&#8217;m digging myself into, I&#8217;d argue that the marking and feedback on our short-answer questions is actually done by me, the question author. I set up the rules and wrote the feedback interventions iteratively, in the light of careful inspection of hundreds and sometimes thousands of real student responses.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I am grateful to Carol Bailey (see previous post) who, following a discussion over lunch, sent me a link to an extremely interesting paper: Vojak, C., Kline, S., Cope, B., McCarthey, S. and Kalantzis, M. (2011) New Spaces and Old &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/?p=1399\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[278,277,56],"tags":[428,427,57],"class_list":["post-1399","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-essay-marking-software","category-essays","category-short-answer-free-text-questions","tag-essay-marking-software","tag-essays","tag-short-answer-free-text"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1399","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1399"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1399\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1433,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1399\/revisions\/1433"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1399"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1399"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1399"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}