{"id":1459,"date":"2013-07-07T08:49:04","date_gmt":"2013-07-07T08:49:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/?p=1459"},"modified":"2013-07-07T09:02:30","modified_gmt":"2013-07-07T09:02:30","slug":"when-the-numbers-dont-add-up","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/?p=1459","title":{"rendered":"When the numbers don&#8217;t add up"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/07\/Capture1.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-1464\" title=\"Capture\" src=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/07\/Capture1-300x186.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"186\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/07\/Capture1-300x186.png 300w, https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/wp-content\/uploads\/2013\/07\/Capture1.png 374w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a>I am in a (very brief) lull between the <a href=\"http:\/\/aheconference.com\/\">Assessment in Higher Education Conference<\/a>, <a href=\"http:\/\/caaconference.co.uk\/\">CAA 2013<\/a>, masses of work in my &#8216;day job&#8217; and a determination to both carry on writing papers and to get some time off for walking and my <a href=\"https:\/\/sites.google.com\/site\/jordanwalks\/\">walking website<\/a>. The Assessment in Higher Education Conference was great and, hopefully before CAA 2013 starts on Tuesday, I will post about some of the things I learned. However first, I&#8217;d like to reflect on something completely different.<\/p>\n<p>During the week I was at an Award Board for a new OU module. All did not run smoothly. The module requires students to demonstrate &#8216;satisfactory participation&#8217;, but we&#8217;d used a horrible manual process to record this. Not surprisingly, errors crept in. Now the OU Exams procedures are pretty robust and the problem was &#8216;caught&#8217;. We stopped the Award Board, all the data were re-entered and checked, checked and checked again and we reconvened later in the week &#8211; and brought the board to a satisfactory conclusion. My point is that people make mistakes.<\/p>\n<p>Next I would like to reflect on the degree results of one of my young relations at a UK Russell Group University.\u00a0She got a 2:1, which was what she was aiming for, but was devastated that she &#8216;only&#8217; got 64%, not the 67% she was aiming for. Now this is in a humanities subject &#8211; how on Earth can you actually distinguish numerically to that level of precision?<\/p>\n<p>My general point is that, given that humans make mistakes &#8211; and even if they don&#8217;t their marking is pretty subjective &#8211; why do we persist in\u00a0putting such faith in\u00a0precise MARKS. It just doesn&#8217;t add up. I am pretty confident that, at our Award Board, we made the right decisions at the distinction\/pass\/fail boundaries and I am similarly confident that my young relative&#8217;s degree classification is what was demonstrably achieved. I&#8217;d reassure those of you who have never sat on a Award Board that considerable care is taken to make sure that this is the case. However, at a finer level,\u00a0can we be\u00a0sure about the exact percentage? I don&#8217;t think so.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I am in a (very brief) lull between the Assessment in Higher Education Conference, CAA 2013, masses of work in my &#8216;day job&#8217; and a determination to both carry on writing papers and to get some time off for walking &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/?p=1459\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[128],"tags":[375],"class_list":["post-1459","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-marking-accuracy","tag-marking-accuracy"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1459","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1459"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1459\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1465,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1459\/revisions\/1465"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1459"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1459"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/SallyJordan\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1459"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}