Last week,\u00a0I participated in\u00a0a ‘Quality Enhancement Seminar’ on ‘Effective use of interactive computer-marked assessment’. A list of tips I gave included the following two points:<\/p>\n
11. Embed iCMAs carefully within the module\u2019s assessment strategy, considering carefully whether you want them to be formative-only, summative, thresholded etc.;<\/p>\n
12. Work towards a consistent approach at the qualification, programme and Faculty level (at least).<\/p>\n
Afterwards I was asked how the above two points can be reconciled. The questioner had a point. We want each module to have a carefully thought out assessment strategy, using e-assessment when but only when appropriate. But yet I have become more and more worried about the confusion we cause by having lots of different models for different modules. I’ve become convinced that we need to take a more joined up approach. Which is more important, having the detailed assessment strategy that is absolutely right for each module or having a consistent approach across a qualification? I’m not sure. It is at least good that so many people are giving careful consideration to these matters.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
Last week,\u00a0I participated in\u00a0a ‘Quality Enhancement Seminar’ on ‘Effective use of interactive computer-marked assessment’. A list of tips I gave included the following two points: 11. Embed iCMAs carefully within the module\u2019s assessment strategy, considering carefully whether you want them … Continue reading