{"id":3879,"date":"2021-10-20T16:29:34","date_gmt":"2021-10-20T16:29:34","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/?p=3879"},"modified":"2021-11-17T10:45:38","modified_gmt":"2021-11-17T10:45:38","slug":"sustainability-in-the-built-environment-uk-government-inquiry","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/sustainability-in-the-built-environment-uk-government-inquiry\/","title":{"rendered":"Sustainability in the Built Environment: UK Government Inquiry"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_3880\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3880\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/committees.parliament.uk\/work\/1147\/sustainability-of-the-built-environment\/publications\/\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-3880 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Screenshot-of-EAC-Westminster-Oct-2021-300x169.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"169\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Screenshot-of-EAC-Westminster-Oct-2021-300x169.png 300w, https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Screenshot-of-EAC-Westminster-Oct-2021-768x433.png 768w, https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Screenshot-of-EAC-Westminster-Oct-2021-960x541.png 960w, https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-content\/uploads\/2021\/10\/Screenshot-of-EAC-Westminster-Oct-2021.png 1306w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-3880\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">The Environmental Audit Committee meeting in Westminster and online, on 20th October 2021<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Earlier this year the Environmental Audit Committee published a <a href=\"https:\/\/committees.parliament.uk\/call-for-evidence\/440\/\" >Call for Evidence<\/a> on how best to reach \u2018net zero\u2019 in our built environment. They received <a href=\"https:\/\/committees.parliament.uk\/work\/1147\/sustainability-of-the-built-environment\/publications\/\" >140 written responses<\/a>, including two from members of the Design group, Alice Moncaster and Jane Anderson. \u00a0Both were also invited to give evidence in person (virtually), Jane on 14<sup>th<\/sup>\u00a0July and Alice on 20<sup>th<\/sup> October.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>What is the Inquiry all about?<\/p>\n<p>It&#8217;s well known that the built environment is responsible for about 39% of global carbon emissions. \u00a0However it is less well known that this figure has two very distinct sections: the construction of the built environment is responsible for 11% of these emissions, while\u00a0the energy used for heating, lighting and cooling our existing buildings is responsible for the other 28%. \u00a0We all live, work, shop and go to school in buildings, so in many ways it\u2019s not surprising that a big percentage of our energy use goes into making those spaces more comfortable. But that doesn\u2019t mean that we can\u2019t reduce those emissions \u2013 we certainly can, and are doing so, through improved insulation levels and more airtight construction.\u00a0A key focus of the building regulations for many years, for Governments across the world, has been on increasing energy efficiency of (new) buildings. Increasingly we are starting to look at how to radically retrofit existing buildings to reduce their energy use too.<\/p>\n<p>In most of Europe and the UK, construction is responsible for\u00a0around 9% of our national emissions &#8211; this is lower than the global average, and compares with China for which construction is around 16% of their carbon emissions. However this is still a higher percentage even than flying (7.5%). Given that in this country we add only around 1% to our built environment each year, the fact that the construction of this 1% (plus a little bit on refurbishing and demolition) costs the 9% of our carbon budget shows what huge impacts construction materials and processes have.<\/p>\n<p>Why isn\u2019t anything being done about it?<\/p>\n<p>Well, with the EAC Inquiry it seems as if at last something is being done. Many of us have been researching this area of embodied carbon of buildings for years. There are now countless case studies of individual buildings. International standards have existed since 2011 to calculate the carbon impact of individual building products and materials, and the embodied carbon of a building through its life. Industry groups have even started lobbying for the inclusion of embodied carbon in building regulations. In the UK, the methodology has been further developed as a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.rics.org\/globalassets\/rics-website\/media\/news\/whole-life-carbon-assessment-for-the--built-environment-november-2017.pdf\" >Professional Statement<\/a> by the Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors (RICS) in 2017 \u2013 a project which Alice and Jane were also both involved in \u2013 and this is starting to be used widely but on a voluntary basis.\u00a0 Some other European countries have started to introduce regulations.\u00a0 The UK Government are now starting to take note, and embodied carbon is a key element of this Environmental Audit Committee Inquiry.<\/p>\n<p>Who are the OU experts in this area?<\/p>\n<p>Dr Alice Moncaster is an expert in environmental impacts of buildings. Since 2011 she has been the UK expert on two International Energy Agency Annexes (<a href=\"http:\/\/www.annex57.org\/\" >Annex 57<\/a> and <a href=\"https:\/\/annex72.iea-ebc.org\/\" >Annex 72<\/a>) on embodied and whole life carbon and energy of buildings, and was the academic partner in the development of the 2017 RICS professional statement. Jane Anderson is an expert in environmental impacts of construction materials.\u00a0 She was the author of several of the BRE <a href=\"https:\/\/www.bregroup.com\/greenguide\/podpage.jsp?id=2126\" >Green Guides to Specification<\/a> from 1998-2010, and is the UK expert on the European (CEN) and international (ISO) standards bodies who have developed the current standards. She is currently undertaking a PhD with Dr Moncaster at the OU. She was responding to the Inquiry on behalf of the Alliance for Sustainable Building Products (ASBP) where she is a Board member.<\/p>\n<p>Alice\u2019s written evidence can be found <a href=\"https:\/\/committees.parliament.uk\/writtenevidence\/36200\/pdf\/\" >here<\/a>, and Jane\u2019s can be found <a href=\"https:\/\/committees.parliament.uk\/writtenevidence\/35868\/pdf\/\" >here<\/a>, and <a href=\"https:\/\/committees.parliament.uk\/writtenevidence\/38990\/pdf\/\" >here<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>This article has been updated on 17th November. \u00a0The third session of oral evidence is being heard this afternoon, with experts from Cambridge University, the IStructE and others due to answer questions from the committee.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; &nbsp; Earlier this year the Environmental Audit Committee published a Call for Evidence on how best to reach \u2018net zero\u2019 in our built environment. They received 140 written responses, including two from members of the Design group, Alice Moncaster and Jane Anderson. \u00a0Both were also invited to give evidence in person (virtually), Jane on [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":23,"featured_media":3880,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[254],"tags":[85,10],"class_list":["post-3879","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-design-for-sustainability","tag-built-environment","tag-sustainability"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3879","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/23"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3879"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3879\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3991,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3879\/revisions\/3991"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3880"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3879"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3879"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/design\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3879"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}