{"id":324,"date":"2018-02-20T11:46:00","date_gmt":"2018-02-20T11:46:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/?p=324"},"modified":"2018-03-21T07:25:21","modified_gmt":"2018-03-21T07:25:21","slug":"response-to-direct-and-mediated-contact-further-questions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/response-to-direct-and-mediated-contact-further-questions\/","title":{"rendered":"Response to Direct and Mediated Contact: Further Questions"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/teaching.png\" ><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-305\" src=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/teaching-300x140.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"140\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/teaching-300x140.png 300w, https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/teaching-768x359.png 768w, https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/02\/teaching.png 846w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/people\/rfa2\" >Richard Allen<\/a><\/p>\n<p>The analysis and the questions raised in the previous posting on <a href=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/direct-and-mediated-contact-for-literary-pedagogy\/\" >Direct and Mediated Contact in Literary Pedagogy<\/a> are pertinent to the future of Literary Studies. My comments here don\u2019t dare to provide answers but raise two issues which I think are relevant and which might require Suman&#8217;s questions to be posed in a more nuanced or variegated way.<\/p>\n<p>First there\u2019s a tendency to see Literary Studies and Higher Education in a somewhat monolithic way in Suman&#8217;s piece. In fact Higher Education has had and continues to have a strongly social class related hierarchy. So, do universities which attract and accept applicants from private schools and have significant endowments face the questions you raise in the same way as universities which are struggling to achieve recruitments and maintain income and whose managers then feel they need to \u2018restructure\u2019? Certainly some of these elite universities have found already methods of keeping the costs of direct contact pedagogy down by dint of employing junior researchers and others with ambitions to be academics in a way that is close to the \u2018gig\u2019 economy which has spread so much in recent years in the UK. There perhaps isn\u2019t either a simple relationship between high status and direct contact pedagogy since a good number of the FE Colleges that have developed HE streams have found ways of teaching HE students in a quite intensive \u2018direct contact\u2019 way. This is to a significant extent because their teaching staff aren\u2019t involved in research &#8212; another factor that is relevant to the issues here. But perhaps as relevant here is the fact that these FE colleges do not share\/enjoy the massification and growth in student numbers that are found in most middle ranking universities. So perhaps the questions Suman raises are particularly pertinent to the middle of the hierarchy. Or maybe one should also put things onto a time dimension and say they are particularly relevant to the middle of the range <em>now<\/em> but the question will come to others in time?<\/p>\n<p>The second issue here is the relation of study and employment and the ideological frameworks within which English Studies sit. The dominant framework for government policy makers now seems to be that the study of Humanities subjects should be subsidised less than the study of, for example, Medicine or Engineering. A higher government subsidy for these latter \u2018useful\u2019 subjects might &#8212; the Panglossion argument recently advanced goes &#8212; enable universities to reduce the fees for Humanities subjects. More likely any reduction in fees would be matched by a reduction in resources allocated to Humanities, hastening the shift to mediated contact pedagogy learning which Suman describes. \u00a0What is the result of thinking through the issues Suman describes in this frame? Is English Studies taught by \u2018mediated contact\u2019 likely to produce a social group competing for middle ranking \u2018white collar\u2019 jobs &#8212; just the group that some predict will be most detrimentally affected by increased automation and artificial intelligence? <a href=\"https:\/\/books.google.co.uk\/books?id=uMPlCAAAQBAJ&amp;printsec=frontcover#v=onepage&amp;q&amp;f=false\" >Research done by Suman and myself<\/a> with others in India has perhaps a potentially intriguing relevance here. There we found that in the group of elite universities, studying English Literature was seen as valuable by students not just because of the skills they learned but because it would provide them with the skill and knowledge to position themselves within a high status social group. Can the whole range of what Suman calls \u2018cultural formations\u2019 be directed to a simple model of what students will do after they graduate or are different approaches required? How do those creating courses understand and place themselves in a \u2018cultural present\u2019 formed in such a variegated environment?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Richard Allen The analysis and the questions raised in the previous posting on Direct and Mediated Contact in Literary Pedagogy are pertinent to the future of Literary Studies. My comments here don\u2019t dare to provide answers but raise two issues &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/response-to-direct-and-mediated-contact-further-questions\/\" >Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-324","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-teaching-and-learning"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=324"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":335,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/324\/revisions\/335"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}