![\"\"](\"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/english\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/bookzzz2.png\")
<\/a><\/p>\nWhen I saw the conference programme for The Book as Cure: Bibliotherapy and Literary Caregiving from the First World War to the Present<\/a><\/em>, I genuinely could not believe my luck.\u00a0 As a creative writing PhD student researching bibliotherapy, there were so many compelling paper titles it was difficult to decide which panels to attend. \u00a0In fact, it was the \u2018Reading and Self-improvement\u2019<\/a> event, part of the AHRC funded \u2018Reading Communities: Connecting the Past and the Present\u2019<\/a> project (also run by The Open University) in March 2016 that inspired me to pursue both my own creative writing and this field of academic research. Since then I have been immersed in existing scholarship on bibliotherapy and have started to design my own empirical research in the area. However, as every PhD student knows too well, independent research can be isolating and lonely. There really is no substitute for a conference and the opportunity to listen to and question experts in your field.\u00a0 Fortunately for me The Book as Cure <\/em>appeared on my radar just as I was beginning to feel the need for peer input very keenly.<\/p>\n Under the aegis of the Open University\u2019s History of Books and Reading (HOBAR) research collaboration and organised by four English and Creative Writing academics at The Open University – Shafquat Towheed<\/a>, Siobhan Campbell<\/a>, Sara Haslam<\/a>, and Edmund King<\/a> – supported by plenary speakers Dr Jane Potter<\/a> (Oxford Brookes University) and Dr Peter Leese<\/a> (University of Copenhagen), the event marked the centenary of the war\u2019s end and guided attendees on a bibliotherapeutic journey from wartime to the present.<\/p>\n Photo: Shafquat Towheed<\/p><\/div>\n Dr Potter opened the sessions by describing some of the perceptions surrounding bibliotherapy during the First World War; not only in terms of its importance to traumatised and injured soldiers, but also for those left waiting at home for loved ones. Her keynote lecture: \u2018The Solace of Literature: Reading and Writing in the Great War\u2019 noted that psychiatrists, nurses and surgeons became increasingly convinced of the therapeutic benefits of reading and quoted one wartime caregiver who observed that until this point \u201cWe protected his [the soldier\u2019s] stomach but forgot his brains.\u201d She also highlighted the importance placed on the hospital librarian who \u201cunderstood both books and men\u201d, a highly esteemed and respected role, that was remarked upon across several of the day\u2019s presentations.<\/p>\n As was acknowledged on Twitter, a number of key themes emerged early on: we repeatedly heard the terms \u2018administering\u2019, \u2018prescribing\u2019, and \u2018dispensing\u2019 used in relation to the provision of books for their curative properties. Mary Mahoney\u2019s<\/a> research suggests that the adoption of a very scientific or medical approach to bibliotherapy was particularly prevalent in America in the 1920s and 1930s. These analogies were echoed throughout the day, with references to reading acting as medicine for the troubled mind. An excellent example of this came from the journal of the writer and scientist (and MS sufferer) W.N.P. Barbellion (1889-1919), who wrote in his journal the phrase: \u2018what I do is drug my mind with print\u2019. We heard doctors of the day cautioning on reading the \u2018wrong\u2019 kind of novels, and how the consumption of these could cause \u2018overdose\u2019 and lead to \u2018hysteria\u2019.<\/p>\n This leads us to the books used in bibliotherapy: there have been many differing opinions over the last two centuries about what is considered suitable reading material. Should specific books be prescribed, or avoided, based on a particular illness or condition? One wartime writer noted that \u2018Jane Austen has taken her fragrant way into a surprising number of dug-outs\u2019 which stood in contrast to the advice of some medical professionals of the time, who recommended literature that promoted \u2018detachment, elevation, and mental economy\u2019. \u00a0Kipling\u2019s \u2018The Janeites\u2019 also refers to Austen\u2019s, perhaps unexpected, popularity with those in the trenches. On this subject, Laura Blair\u2019s presentation: \u2018Reading, Asylum Libraries, and the Asylum War Hospital Scheme\u2019,<\/em> we heard how asylums and their libraries were turned over to war hospitals and how strong concern was voiced regarding \u2018appropriate\u2019 reading material and particularly the fear of encouraging \u2018addiction to novels\u2019.\u00a0 Yet, from soldiers\u2019 diaries and hospital librarians\u2019 records we can see that reading tastes were eclectic, with detective stories, poetry and romance very much in demand.<\/p>\n Portrait of Rudyard Kipling from Rudyard Kipling<\/em> by John Palmer.\u00a0 Used under Wikipedia:Text of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License<\/em><\/p><\/div>\n The subject of the detective tale used in bibliotherapy was broached several times; first in George Simmer\u2019s paper \u201cKipling\u2019s \u2018Fairy-Kist\u2019: Bibliotherapy Gone Haywire?\u201d. Simmer reviewed what may have been Kipling\u2019s own experience of bibliotherapy, making the case that Kipling\u2019s childhood reading of Julia Ewing influenced the writing of his only detective story, Fairy-Kist<\/em> (1928), about an ex-serviceman who hears voices, and ends up the prime suspect in a murder case. Simmer suggests that Ewing was the Jacqueline Wilson of the nineteenth century, taking difficult subjects and making them accessible, this being why she would have appealed to the troubled young Kipling.<\/p>\n An especially emotive case study demonstrating the efficacy of bibliotherapy for children suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder came in the final session of the day from Wendy French who read a poem from an adolescent boy. His writing expressed the depths of his self-loathing by listing all the ways \u2018shit\u2019 served more purpose in life than he did.\u00a0 This particular boy related to Michael Morpurgo\u2019s illustrated book Not Bad for a Bad Lad<\/em> in his counselling sessions and this enabled an on-going and positive dialogue with French.<\/p>\n A particular highlight for me was the chance to hear in detail the important research being undertaken by Laura Dietz<\/a>, my second supervisor at Anglia Ruskin University.\u00a0 Her work into immersion and engagement with e-novels, suggests that screen reading, on devices such as Kindles and iPads, may see the reader equally immersed in the narrative as with a printed book. For many reasons, most notably their accessibility, digital books are critical to bibliotherapeutic practice. Dietz\u2019s research used a wider range of e-book formats compared to earlier studies, which is perhaps one of the reasons her findings reveal narrative immersion to be a more nuanced or complex phenomenon than was initially believed.<\/p>\n On a personal level, one of the standout aspects of conference was the friendliness and generosity of the organisers, experts and panellists. All of the presentations I attended were insightful and persuasively communicated. I am delighted to have already exchanged emails, received papers and references for further reading that will enrich my research, which explores the place of short and fantasy fiction in bibliotherapy for women with depression.<\/p>\n Photo: Shafquat Towheed<\/p><\/div>\n In the summary session we mused over the key questions that had arisen over the course of the day: Is reading inherently good? Does the genre of the literature make a difference? Is the term \u2018bibliotherapy\u2019 itself a valid or helpful one? What does the future hold for the field and who should be advocating and delivering bibliotherapy? Is the future digital? Is the efficacy of bibliotherapy limited to specific audiences? For each of these questions the conference provided empirical indicators, anecdotal evidence and qualitative findings, all of which deserve further, deeper, and broader exploration. I, for one, hope that there is a follow up conference for The Book as Cure<\/em> and I expect this sentiment is shared by the majority of attendees.<\/p>\n I\u2019ll end my account with a quote from my own paper where Alan Bennett, in William Seighert\u2019s The Poetry Pharmacy<\/em>, encapsulates the essence of a good book but also that of successful bibliotherapeutic intervention:<\/p>\n \u201cThe best moments in reading are when you come across something \u2013 a thought, a feeling, a way of looking at things \u2013 which you had thought special and particular to you. Now here it is, set down by someone else, a person you have never met, someone even who is long dead. And it is as if a hand has come out and taken yours.\u201d<\/p>\n Jenny Cattier is a\u00a0PhD researcher at Anglia Ruskin University\u00a0examining\u00a0the therapeutic potential of short fantasy fiction for female depression. Her thesis will be fifty percent research and critical commentary, and fifty percent of her own creative writing which will take the form of a collection of short stories.\u00a0<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Jenny Cattier PhD student, Anglia Ruskin University When I saw the conference programme for The Book as Cure: Bibliotherapy and Literary Caregiving from the First World War to the Present, I genuinely could not believe my luck.\u00a0 As a creative … Continue reading <\/a><\/a><\/a>