Author Archives: admin

Role Ethics Network (March 22 workshop)

Alex Barber and Sean Cordell are running an AHRC funded project, the Role Ethics Network, with a number of events over 18 months involving academics from across the globe. The rationale of the project is that social roles – our occupancy and performance of them – shape our ethical lives in ways that have not been fully appreciated or understood. Full details are on the project website.

The next is a workshop in Manchester on March 22, at which Alex will deliver a paper on a puzzle about wellbeing: wellbeing is an individualist notion (it equates to that which is good for a particular person), and achievement is an ingredient of wellbeing, but achievement is often collective rather than individual (just think about orchestral performance). Alex argues that thinking about the fulfillingness of role occupancy and role performance can help dissolve the tension.

Share

Upcoming talks and a publication by Cristina Chimisso

Cristina Chimisso will be a keynote speaker at the conference on ‘Bachelard today: Bachelard and contemporary philosophy’ at Leuven University (Belgium), 24-25 April 2017 . The title of her talk is ‘History, chemistry and knowledge’.

She is also talking at the annual conference of the British Society for the History of Philosophy (University of Sheffield, 6-8 April 2017), contributing a paper called ‘Philosophy and history of science: Hélène Metzger on anachronism’ as part of the panel that she organised on ‘History, philosophy and science in French epistemology’.

In March she’ll be giving a graduate seminar at the University of Milan, as she has recently done at the Universities of Cambridge and of Paris I (Sorbonne).

The second edition of the Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology, for which she has written a new entry ‘Bachelard, Gaston’, is now on-line. Her OU page has more on her research and publications.

Share

Research seminar, 1 March 2017: Kant on race

The seminar will be held at the Open University’s campus at Walton Hall, in meeting room 5, Wilson A, from 2pm – 4pm, Wed 1 March 2017.

Professor Stella Sandford (Kingston University) ‘Kant, Teleology and Natural History: “Race” in the Critique of Pure Reason’

Abstract: As the fact and the nature of Kant’s controversial essays on race become better known, the question of their relationship to his major philosophical works is extremely vexing. Starting with the critical philosophy, and recognising the application of aspects of it in the essays on race, still allows, in principle, for their separation, isolating and marginalizing the topic of ‘race’ in Kant’s oeuvre. Starting instead with Kant’s ‘natural history of the human races’, this talk will suggest that there are ways in which Kant’s work on race may be more tightly woven into the critical philosophy that has hitherto been recognized, giving aspects of the critical philosophy – specifically Kant’s philosophical claims concerning the necessity of teleological judgement in both the Critique of Pure Reason and the Critique of the Power of Judgement – its lead, and perhaps even its practical motivation. Although this does not mean that the critical philosophy is hopelessly compromised (study of it will remain important and productive), this does mean that the place of ‘race’ in Kant’s oeuvre will need to be reconsidered.

All welcome. Contact: Cristina Chimisso

Share

Metaphysics Day

OU Philosophy welcomed guest speaker Phillip Meadows from the United Arab Emirates University to a one-off Metaphysics Day on November 30 2016. He talked about the puzzle of absences, which seem to be both vital to causal explanations (‘It happened because there were no electron’) and yet incapable of causing anything (‘How can absent electrons, or absent anything elses for that matter, have causal properties?’)

OU philosophers rounded out the day with contributions on the metaphysics of sports (Jon Pike), moral refutations of metaphysics (Alex Barber) and the objectivity of ordinary life (Sophie Grace Chappell).

Share

Award for OU documentary

A documentary film commissioned jointly by the Open University and the BBC, and for which Derek Matravers was Academic Adviser, has won the Best Documentary on a Contemporary Theme (Domestic) at the prestigious Grierson Trust awards. The jury chair described How To Die: Simon’s Choice as ‘a deeply moving’ film that made ‘a valuable contribution to the debates surrounding these big issues’. The film was shown on BBC2 earlier this year.

Share

David Roden

David Roden, Associate Lecturer and Honorary Associate, has a commissioned piece, Letters from the Ocean Terminus, in an issue of Dis Magazine on the ‘postcontemporary’ edited by Suhail Malik and Armen Avenessian. Its theme is time and art in a globalised order whose stability is undermined by systems for pre-empting its futures.  It blends science fiction and philosophical commentary to imagine a febrile agent at home in this speculative present; one that refashions itself by mining uncanny posthuman futures. An introduction to the issue and links to other contributions can be found here.

Share

R. Scott Kretchmar essay prize winner

Christopher Yorke, an Open University PhD student in Philosophy, has won the R. Scott Kretchmar Graduate Student Essay Prize awarded by the International Association for the Philosophy of Sport conference, in September in Greece. This is the biggest conference in Philosophy of Sport, and there’s only one prize. Congratulations Chris!

The essay that won him the prize is called ‘Endless Summer: What Kinds of Games will Suits’ Utopians Play?’

Share

Departmental Research Seminar, 4th May 2016

This event is organized by the History of Philosophy Research Group. The seminar will be held at the Open University’s campus at Walton Hall, in Perry C, Meeting Room 04, from 2pm – 4pm. Contact: Cristina Chimisso.

Professor David Webb (University of Staffordshire)

‘Archaeology and Ethics in the Work of Michel Foucault’

Abstract: Foucault’s work is sometimes divided into periods; for example, designated archaeology, genealogy, ethics. I will argue that this is a mistaken approach that fails to appreciate the extent to which the modes of analysis he develops in his earlier work open the space for his later interest in ethics and the care of the self. In particular, Foucault’s archaeological method not only responds to challenges he identified at the end of The Order of Things, but also sets the conditions for the separation of knowledge and truth that he goes on to explore from the early 1970s. In this paper, I will show how archaeology is linked to the separation of knowledge and truth, and how this in turn leads to Foucault’s distinctive approach to ethics in his later work.

 

Share

Derek Matravers interviewed in ASAGE

Derek Matravers answers questions about his book, Fiction and Narrative, put to him by Michel-Antoine Xhignesse for ASAGE, an online journal in aesthetics and the philosophy of art. The opener:

“For those of our readers who may not have had a chance to read your book yet, could you explain its main thrust?”

Go here to read his answer, and to find out why he is so appalled by Wind in the Willows (“Give one iota of thought to it, and it just falls to bits. It starts looking utterly horrific: animals talking to each other one moment, and then sticking each other between slices of bread and eating one another the next”).

Share

History of Philosophy Research Group seminar: Wednesday 6 April

Professor Thomas Uebel of the University of Manchester will present a Philosophy Department Research Seminar, at the Walton Hall campus, Wilson A, Meeting Room 05, from 2pm – 4pm on April 6.

Schlick and Wittgenstein: The Theory of ‘Konstatierungen’ Revisited

Abstract: Viewed from the perspective of the epistemology of science, Schlick’s theory of affirmations (‘Konstatierungen’) was a failure. Schlick meant affirmations to be observation statements that were not identical with the protocol statements recordable by scientists in the course of their work yet in some sense grounded our knowledge of the world. Interpreters either rejected the theory wholesale or saved only part of it for the price of discarding some other property that affirmations supposedly possessed. The present paper investigates whether it is possible to provide a more favourable interpretation of Schlick’s theory of affirmations by relating them more closely to the views and ideas of the ‘middle’ Wittgenstein, namely. In particular, it may be regarded as an attempt to improve his much earlier response to the challenge of skepticism by means which his familiarity with Wittgenstein’s unpublished writings made available to him.

All welcome. This event is hosted by the History of Philosophy Research Group. For information, contact: Cristina Chimisso

 

Share