{"id":219,"date":"2007-07-12T15:28:11","date_gmt":"2007-07-12T15:28:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/conclave.open.ac.uk\/r.m.ferguson\/?p=219"},"modified":"2007-07-12T15:28:11","modified_gmt":"2007-07-12T15:28:11","slug":"further-thoughts-on-cops","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/r.m.ferguson\/?p=219","title":{"rendered":"Further thoughts on CoPs"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been back to Wenger&#8217;s book to try to address my queries. I think it&#8217;s the case that, with his &#8216;communities of practice&#8217; label, he is seekng to mark these communities off from other groupings which have been labelled &#8216;community&#8217; but which don&#8217;t really live up to that definition.<\/p>\n<p>He says that &#8216;membership is not just a matter of social category, declaring allegiance, belonging to an organisation, having a title, or having personal relations with some people&#8230; Neither is geographical proximity sufficent to develop a practice.&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>To take those one by one. &#8216;Social category&#8217;. I suppose you could talk of the &#8216;working-class community&#8217; or the &#8216;academic community&#8217;. But to distinguish &#8216;working-class community&#8217; from &#8216;working class&#8217; implies some sort of collective belief or action or experience if the label is not to form a redundant addition.<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Declaring allegiance&#8217;. Well, you could define yourself as Russian, or a Chelsea supporter or a Boyzone fan. Would we use community to describe any of those groupings? Probably not &#8211; unless it were a group of Russians abroad. England might have a &#8216;Russian community&#8217; but, again, you need to be talking of some collective belief, action or experience.<\/p>\n<p>Having a title. The comunity of lords? The community of doctors? The community of politicians? The community of archbishops? No, can&#8217;t see this one at all. They might be the aristocracy or the intelligentsia or the nobility but not a community.<\/p>\n<p>Having personal relations with some people. A friendship group? A string of ex-boyfriends? Can&#8217;t see any reason for defining a group of people as a community unless they do something more than meet each other.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Geographical proximity. This is the one which is pertinent with regard to physical \/ virtual communities. But, even in the physical world, does it make any sense to refer to the people of Milton Keynes as a community unless it is with respect to collective belief or action or experience ?<\/p>\n<p>So, the advantage of\u00a0 &#8216;community of practice&#8217; is that it eliminates woolly uses of the word &#8216;community&#8217;. However, in doing so, it introduces redundancies and confusions of its own.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I&#8217;ve been back to Wenger&#8217;s book to try to address my queries. I think it&#8217;s the case that, with his &#8216;communities of practice&#8217; label, he is seekng to mark these communities off from other groupings which have been labelled &#8216;community&#8217; but which don&#8217;t really live up to that definition. He says that &#8216;membership is not [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-219","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-communities"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/r.m.ferguson\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/r.m.ferguson\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/r.m.ferguson\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/r.m.ferguson\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/r.m.ferguson\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=219"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/r.m.ferguson\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/219\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/r.m.ferguson\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=219"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/r.m.ferguson\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=219"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.open.ac.uk\/blogs\/r.m.ferguson\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=219"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}