![\"colourful](\"https:\/\/images.unsplash.com\/photo-1504196606672-aef5c9cefc92?ixid=MnwxMjA3fDB8MHxwaG90by1wYWdlfHx8fGVufDB8fHx8&ixlib=rb-1.2.1&auto=format&fit=crop&w=750&q=80\")
Abstract<\/strong><\/h2>\nThis research explores how language and identity are negotiated by study abroad\u00a0doctoral researchers originally from China, Brazil, Iran and Ukraine whilst studying\u00a0in France. The research questions investigated the language choices made in the\u00a0contexts encountered by the SA doctoral researchers, how these choices were\u00a0negotiated and the potential impacts of the use of both French and English on their\u00a0identities.<\/p>\n
To address the three research questions posed in this study I have used a case\u00a0study framework to explore the SA doctoral researchers\u2019 use of language, their\u00a0possibilities of negotiation of language choice as well as how these experiences\u00a0impact their identities using both emic and etic perspectives. A framework was\u00a0developed from the literature review, using Bourdieu\u2019s concepts of social and\u00a0linguistic capital as well as habitus. Byram\u2019s work on intercultural awareness was\u00a0also of relevance, as was Lave and Wenger\u2019s legitimate peripheral participation.\u00a0For identity the Block, Norton and Ting-Toomey\u2019s work provided a framework. A\u00a0series of three semi-structured interviews were undertaken with SA doctoral\u00a0researchers on an individual basis as the main research method, research with\u00a0further individual interviews with supervisors to explore the questions from another
\nperspective. Other methods included questionnaires and observations of language\u00a0use in context.<\/p>\n
The findings show the uses and potential linguistic capital for both English and\u00a0French often vary depending on the community, affecting access, even with the\u00a0same members participating and impacting on identities. This can influence the\u00a0investment of the participants in both languages and ultimately their experience in\u00a0France. To improve participation SA doctoral researchers should learn a minimum\u00a0of the local language prior to undertaking three years of study in a non-English speaking country. Investment in social English for local and study abroad doctoral\u00a0researchers could contribute to better understanding through third space and\u00a0communication.<\/p>\n
\nperspective. Other methods included questionnaires and observations of language\u00a0use in context.<\/p>\n