acculturation

The Shah Jahan Mosque, Woking

About: 

The Shah Jahan Mosque at Woking was Britain’s first purpose-built mosque. It was established in 1889 by the Jewish ex-Registrar of the University of Punjab, Gottlieb Leitner, with financial backing from the Begum Shah Jahan of Bhopal. It fell into disuse after Leitner’s death in 1899, but was later resurrected by the Indian lawyer Khwaja Kamuluddin, who established the Woking Muslim Mission in 1912.

The mosque flourished under Kamuluddin’s management and became a hub for Muslims who lived in and visited England. In 1913, Kamuluddin established the mosque’s organ, the Islamic Review, which provides a sense of the mosque and its mission’s activities and approach to Islam. Regular Eid celebrations were held at the Shah Jahan, and Muslim dignitaries from all over the world visited the mosque when in Britain. Photographs printed in the Islamic Review as well as accounts demonstrate the eclecticism of the congregation, which included women and men of a range of nationalities, while articles on numerous subjects suggest the mosque advocated a tolerant and non-sectarian brand of Islam, and sought to accommodate itself to its British context and represent Islam to the British public as compatible with and relevant to their lives. Its success in this respect is suggested by the string of conversions depicted in the Islamic Review. These include some elite British figures such as Lord Headley. Indeed, worshippers were largely from a professional middle-class background, and the mosque retained friendly links with the British establishment, despite its highly controversial allegiance to Turkey and the Ottoman Empire during the First World War.

The Shah Jahan had numerous Imams over the years, as well as frequently hosting visiting preachers. A cemetery nearby on Horsell Common provided burials for Muslims, especially for Muslim soldiers who were killed in the World Wars. After the Second World War, the Shah Jahan lost some of its influence, and other mosques were established, such as the East London Mosque and later the Central London Mosque in Regent’s Park. The mosque remains an active place of worship today.

Published works: 

Islamic Review

Example: 

‘Woking – Arrangements with Imam of Mosque at-’, Mss Eur F 143/80, Asian and African Studies Reading Room, British Library, St Pancras, pp. 11-12

Other names: 

Shah Jehan Mosque

Woking Mosque

Woking Mosque and Muslim Mission

Secondary works: 

Ahmad, Nasir, Eid Sermons at the Shah Jehan Mosque, Woking, England, 1931-1940 (Lahore: Aftab-ud-Din Memorial Benevolent Trust, 2002)

Ally, M. M., ‘History of Muslims in Britain, 1850-1980’ (unpublished MA dissertation, University of Birmingham, 1981)

Ansari, Humayun, ‘The Infidel Within’: Muslims in Britain since 1800 (London: Hurst, 2004)

Salamat, Muslim P., A Miracle at Woking: A History of the Shahjahan Mosque

Content: 

This is taken from a statement by Sadr-Ud-Din, Imam of the Woking Mosque, dated 27 August 1915, which was received by the India Office through Sir Walter Lawrence, Commissioner of the Indian Hospitals. In the statement, the Imam complains about the state of the burial ground at Woking and the manner in which the British Government treats dead soldiers. Much of this is disputed in correspondence by government officials and commanding officers at the Indian hospitals (in Brighton, Bournemouth, Brockenhurst) who claim that the Imam is ‘out for mischief’ and a difficult man.

Date began: 
01 Jan 1889
Extract: 

At first the Government blankly refused to do anything, and many months went past. I could not bury the dead soldiers in the marshy piece of unfenced ground over which people and dogs could stray: therefore I buried twenty-five of them in the Mahommedan burial ground at Brockwood at my own expense. This is now full, and I have already buried three in the new burial-place but, though it is fenced in, it is in such a disgraceful state that it would not be policy to allow the Indian soldiers to go and see the burial-place of their comrades. They have frequently asked, but I have had to put them off because – being a loyal subject of His Majesty – I did not desire to raise the resentment which must inevitably be felt when the truth becomes known of the manner in which the British Government have treated their dead heroes.

I have had bodies sent to me bearing the wrong names: bodies sent without any flowers: bodies sent to me at any hour of the day or night without previous notice, and no respect shown for them whatever – not even any military demonstration at their graves.

...

I desire to point out to the Government the very grave danger or allowing the impression to gain ground in India that England is not showing sufficient respect to the memories of her Indian heroes.

Precise date began unknown: 
Y
Key Individuals' Details: 

S. M. Abdullah (in charge of the mosque and mission from 1949), Aftab-ud-Din Ahmad (Imam and editor of Islamic Review), Khwaja Nazir Ahmed (Imam and manager/editor of Islamic Review), Syed Ameer Ali (chairman of the committee), Abdullah Yusuf Ali (involved in Woking Mission), Begum Shah Jahan of Bhopal (funded the original mosque), Khwaja Kamuluddin (established the Woking Muslim Mission and first Imam), Muhammad Yakub Khan (Imam and editor of Islamic Review), Mustafa Khan (Imam and editor of Islamic Review), Gottlieb Wilhelm Leitner (established the original mosque), Abdul Majid (Imam), Muhammad Marmaduke Pickthall (edited Islamic Review, preached at the mosque), Sadr-ud-Din (Imam), Hafiz Shaikh Wahba (preached at the mosque).

Relevance: 

While the Imam’s complaints suggest the treatment of Indian Muslim soldiers as second-class British citizens, despite their sacrifice of life for ‘King and Country’, the assertive nature of his requests also implies a justified sense of entitlement on the part of South Asian Muslims in Britain to the right to have their most fundamental cultural and religious needs met by the British Government. The Imam’s declaration of his loyalty to the King points to his (and potentially other Muslims’) desire to accommodate his faith to Britishness.

Connections: 

Lord Headley (convert, worshipped there), Mohammed Ali Jinnah (attended Eid congregations), Abdul Karim (worshipped there), Syedi Mohamedi (trustee), Firoz Khan Noon (attended Eid congregations), William Bashyr Pickard (convert, worshipped there), Khalid Sheldrake, Hassan Suhrawardy (attended Eid congregations).

Archive source: 

Islamic Review, SV 503, British Library, St Pancras

‘Woking – Arrangements with Imam of Mosque at-’, Mss Eur F 143/80, Asian and African Studies Reading Room, British Library, St Pancras

Location

149 Oriental Road
Woking, GU22 7AN
United Kingdom
Involved in events details: 

Eid celebrations

Second World War (burial of Indian Muslim soldiers at Brockwood Cemetery then Horsell Common)

Liverpool Mosque and Muslim Institute

About: 

The Liverpool Mosque and Muslim Institute of Brougham Terrace was officially established in 1891. Prior to this, however, from as early as 1887, its founder William Quilliam, an English convert to Islam, led a small congregation of Muslims in premises on Mount Vernon Street. The Institute expanded rapidly, encompassing, by the mid-1890s, a madrassa, a library, a printing press, a museum, schools for boys and girls, a hostel and a literary society, as well as the mosque itself, enabling Muslims not just to worship but to conduct their daily lives according to the requirements of their faith.

Quilliam was keen for the mosque to be integrated into Britain and to engage with the British public – no doubt in part in an attempt to fulfil his aim of converting the British nation to Islam. Its orphanage, the Medina Home for Children, was open to children of any faith (who would then be brought up as Muslims) and was established in response to the increase of illegitimate births in the city. Further, the Institute undertook social work beyond its congregation, within the local community. Quilliam encouraged open debate and dialogue about the mosque by writing articles in the local press, also founding and editing two journals, The Crescent and The Islamic World, both of which had an international circulation. According to Ansari, Quilliam ‘was attempting to found an indigenous tradition that would be able to connect with the religious practices of potential converts and so create a sense of receptive familiarity’ (p. 125). Perhaps as a result of this, his congregation, dominated by middle-class converts, grew, with an estimated 600 conversions taking place over twenty years. While the majority of worshippers were English converts, there is evidence that some South Asians resident in Liverpool also attended the mosque. 

Published works: 

The Crescent (1893–1908) [journal of the LMI]

The Islamic World [journal of the LMI]

Example: 

Liverpool Review, 28 November 1891, p. 14

Secondary works: 

Ansari, Humayun, ‘The Infidel Within’: Muslims in Britain since 1800 (London: Hurst, 2004)

Wolffe, John (ed.), Religion in Victorian Britain, Vol. V: Culture and Empire (Manchester: Manchester University Press, 1997)

Content: 

This article was written in response to an article in the Liverpool Post and is critical of the latter for being too tolerant of the LMI’s activities. The article makes reference to an incident involving a crowd throwing fireworks and other missiles at the mosque. It defends this attack, arguing that its perpetrators had a right to feel alienated and antagonized by the presence of the incongruous presence of the mosque and its practices in an English city.

Date began: 
01 Jan 1891
Extract: 

[I]t is not the private and inoffensive worship of Mohammed that is objectionable, but the public advertisement of him. Travellers in the East expect to hear the 'Muezzin' call the faithful to their devotions, for there is nothing unusual or incongruous in the custom there, but the warning voice that fitly sounds from the midst of Eastern minarets and mosque towers is ridiculous from the balcony of a three-storey house in Brougham Terrace. Here it is most incongruous, unusual, silly and unwelcome, and the man who stands howling on a first floor balcony in such a fashion is certain to collect a ribald crowd, anxious to offer him a copper to go into the next street, or even ready to respond to his invitation with something more forcible than jeers. Such things cannot be done with impunity, for they may be expected to interfere with the ways and beliefs of the vast majority, more than one can expect a Catholic band to go scatheless through an Orange district, or an Orange band through a Catholic neighbourhood. It is all very well to preach that the law upholds what people have a right to do, but we are governed by custom as well as by law, and if prevailing customs are not sensibly respected, hard knocks are the inevitable consequence, and should arouse little sympathy.

Precise date began unknown: 
Y
Key Individuals' Details: 

Moulvie Barakat-Ullah (Imam of the LMI), William Quilliam (founder of the LMI).

Relevance: 

This extract is evidence of the hostile response by the press and British public to the practice of Islam in Liverpool. It highlights the dominance of cultural racism (as opposed to colour racism), even in this early period, and resonates with contemporary demands that religion should be confined to the private sphere – demands that entrench the exclusion and marginalization of minorities within the public domain. The extract also suggests the role of space as a site of struggle. It is interesting to contrast this with the positive response on the part of government officials to plans to build a London mosque in Regent’s Park, a central location where the mosque would be highly visible.

Locations

8 Brougham Terrace
Liverpool, L6 1AE
United Kingdom
Mount Vernon Street
Liverpool, L7 8
United Kingdom
Subscribe to RSS - acculturation