Record Number: 30396
Reading Experience:
Evidence:
'I am reading Tait and Stewart’s new book. As far as I have gone, a little disappointed. Is my father reading it?'
Century:1850-1899
Date:Until: 6 Dec 1878
Country:England
Timen/a
Place:city: London
Type of Experience(Reader):
silent aloud unknown
solitary in company unknown
single serial unknown
(Listener):
solitary in company unknown
single serial unknown
Reader / Listener / Reading Group:
Reader: Age:Adult (18-100+)
Gender:Male
Date of Birth:13 Nov 1850
Socio-Economic Group:Professional / academic / merchant / farmer
Occupation:Writer
Religion:Uncommitted
Country of Origin:Scotland
Country of Experience:England
Listeners present if any:e.g family, servants, friends
n/a
Additional Comments:
n/a
Text Being Read:
Author:Balfour/Peter Guthrie [joint authors] Stewart/Tait
Title:Paradoxical Philosophy, a Sequel to the Unseen Universe; or physical speculations on a future state
Genre:Other religious, Philosophy, Cosmology
Form of Text:Print: Book
Publication DetailsLondon 1878? See BL Catalogue and below, Additional Comments
Provenanceunknown
Source Information:
Record ID:30396
Source:Robert Louis Stevenson
Editor:Bradford A. Booth
Title:Letters of Robert Louis Stevenson, April 1874-July 1879
Place of Publication:New Haven and London
Date of Publication:1994
Vol:2
Page:293
Additional Comments:
Letter 589, To his Motherl, [6 December 1878], Savile Club. Co-editor Ernest Mehew. The foregoing material in square brackets has been added by the editors..
Citation:
Robert Louis Stevenson, Bradford A. Booth (ed.), Letters of Robert Louis Stevenson, April 1874-July 1879, (New Haven and London, 1994), 2, p. 293, http://www.open.ac.uk/Arts/reading/UK/record_details.php?id=30396, accessed: 04 May 2024
Additional Comments:
Editors’ Note 5 on p.293 reads: “Paradoxical Philosophy, a Sequel to the Unseen Universe (1878); Cf Letter 394, n. 2.” That Note, Letters 2, p.141, refers to the passage written by RLS on Monday [7 June 1875] alluding to a review of the first book, of which this “new” one is the sequel; and it reads: “In the June [according to the Editors’ this was the June of 1875] Fortnightly W.K. Clifford reviewed The Unseen Universe or Physical Speculations on a Future State , an attempted reconciliation of science and religion, first published anonymously but later acknowledged to be by P.G. Tait and B.Stewart.”
There is a reference to the two Tait and Stewart works in Gordon Booth of Edinburgh's contribution (p.17) to the Notes and Queries section of the G2 supplement of The Guardian, 7 July 2010: “[…] The most notable Victorian expression of the multiple universe notion was written by the physicists Peter Guthrie Tait of Edinburgh and Balfour Stewart of Manchester in their 1875 book, The Unseen Universe, which rapidly went through 17editions and postulated a succession of ever more ‘ethereal’ universes.
“Without the slightest tangible evidence, the authors implied that the human soul followed this post-mortem pilgrimage and thereby attained a wholly non-material immortality. The Unseen Universe and its 1878 sequel, Paradoxical Philosophy, were brilliantly rubbished y the mathematician William Kingdom Clifford in the Fortnightly Review, while James Clerk Maxwell more gently chided the authors privately for ‘attempting to go beyond the range of science’”.