Record Number: 28582
Reading Experience:
Evidence:
'You say [in Walpole's critical study "Joseph Conrad"(1916)] that I have been under the formative influence of "Madame Bovary". In fact I have read it only after finishing "A.[Almayer's] F.[Folly]" as I did all the other works of Flaubert; and anyway my Flaubert is the Flaubert of "St. Antoine" and "Ed[ucation] Sent[imentale]" and that only from the point of view of rendering of concrete things and visual impressions.'
Century:1850-1899
Date:Between 1894 and 7 Jun 1918
Country:unknown
Timen/a
Place:n/a
Type of Experience(Reader):
silent aloud unknown
solitary in company unknown
single serial unknown
(Listener):
solitary in company unknown
single serial unknown
Reader / Listener / Reading Group:
Reader: Age:Adult (18-100+)
Gender:Male
Date of Birth:3 Dec 1857
Socio-Economic Group:Gentry
'Szlachta', or Polish landed gentry/nobility
Master mariner and author
Religion:Roman Catholic
Country of Origin:Poland
Country of Experience:unknown
Listeners present if any:e.g family, servants, friends
n/a
Additional Comments:
n/a
Text Being Read:
Author: Title:Madame Bovary
Genre:Fiction
Form of Text:Print: Book
Publication Detailsfirst published Paris: Charpentier, 1857. The specific French edition read by Conrad unidentified
Provenanceowned
Source Information:
Record ID:28582
Source:Joseph Conrad
Editor:Laurence Davies, Frederick R. Karl and Owen Knowles
Title:The Collected Letters of Joseph Conrad Volume 6, 1917-1919
Place of Publication:Cambridge
Date of Publication:2002
Vol:6
Page:228
Additional Comments:
Letter from Joseph Conrad to Hugh Walpole dated 7 June 1918, Capel House
Citation:
Joseph Conrad, Laurence Davies, Frederick R. Karl and Owen Knowles (ed.), The Collected Letters of Joseph Conrad Volume 6, 1917-1919, (Cambridge, 2002), 6, p. 228, http://www.open.ac.uk/Arts/reading/UK/record_details.php?id=28582, accessed: 04 October 2024
Additional Comments:
There is some confusion as to when Conrad first read Flaubert (see Hervouet, 1990 pp.10-13). Record ID.18526 indicates an earlier date, and Record ID.25760 indicates frequent re-reading. This current record is submitted since it appears to contradict earlier evidence, suggesting that the text was only first read after 1894. No separate entry is recorded concerning the experiences of reading the other two novels mentioned. Conrad's reading of a critical work concerning himself has not been recorded.