Record Number: 32368
Reading Experience:
Evidence:
'I went to a play that would have appealed to you — "Disraeli", which you will remember to have seen reviewed in Punch's "At the play". If the real man was at all like the character in the piece he certainly must have been a prince of cards. I suppose that most of the bons mots that I heard at the Royalty are actual historic ones, preserved in his letters and so forth.'
Century:1900-1945
Date:Between 12 Apr 1916 and 28 May 1916
Country:England
Timen/a
Place:Great Bookham
Surrey
'Gastons'
(Reader):
silent aloud unknown
solitary in company unknown
single serial unknown
(Listener):
solitary in company unknown
single serial unknown
Reader / Listener / Reading Group:
Reader: Age:Child (0-17)
Gender:Male
Date of Birth:29 Nov 1898
Socio-Economic Group:Professional / academic / merchant / farmer
Occupation:Student
Religion:Church of England
Country of Origin:Northern Ireland
Country of Experience:England
Listeners present if any:e.g family, servants, friends
n/a
Additional Comments:
n/a
Text Being Read:
Author: Title:'At the Play: "Disraeli"'
Genre:Essays / Criticism, Review of the play 'Disraeli'
Form of Text:Print: Serial / periodical
Publication DetailsPunch, vol. CL (12 April 1916), p. 252
Provenanceowned
Probably owned by the Kirkpatrick household
Source Information:
Record ID:32368
Source:C. S. Lewis
Editor:Walter Hooper
Title:C. S. Lewis Collected Letters
Place of Publication:London
Date of Publication:2000
Vol:1
Page:184
Additional Comments:
From a letter to his father, 28 May 1916. The play is 'Disraeli: a play in four acts', by Louis Napoleon Parker, published by John Lane, 1916
Citation:
C. S. Lewis, Walter Hooper (ed.), C. S. Lewis Collected Letters, (London, 2000), 1, p. 184, http://www.open.ac.uk/Arts/reading/UK/record_details.php?id=32368, accessed: 09 May 2025
Additional Comments:
'I wouldn't have missed Mr Dennis Eadie's 'Disraeli' for a good deal. Where it was at all possible — which it was in general; Mr Parker only sprinkled his extravagances — the ease and plausibility of it were quite admirable.' (From the final paragraph of the review.) I don't know whether Lewis is remembering reading the review when it was published some six weeks before he saw the play, or whether he re-read it afterwards.