Judging Brexit – What Would Llewellyn and Hart say about Miller 2

In our ongoing Judging Brexit series, our Research Fellow, Marjan Ajevski, has a talk with David Dennis, a Lecturer at the Law School, on what the early Realists would say about the Miler 2. The inspiration for the chat was David’s blog post on the UK’s Constitutional Law Association website, but we take it a bit further here with questions of law-making by courts and what constrains them.

If you prefer to listen rather than watch the talk, you can head over to our sister podcast Research @ OU Law School on SoundCloud, or just follow the link below. Please leave a question or a comment if you wish to continue the conversation further.

This entry was posted in Judging Brexit. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *