Category Archives: Embodiment

Creating Second Life: Blurring the Boundaries – Metalepsis

I must admit, I don’t remember ever hearing the word metalepsis before. And when I google its meaning, I then have to google the meaning of the words used to define it. ‘Trope’ and ‘extradiagetic’ aren’t part of my day-to-day vocabulary – though they might have been if I’d stuck with language and literature instead of veering off towards educational technology.

This definition ‘any intrusion by the extradiegetic narrator or narratee into the diegetic universe (or by diegetic characters into a metadiegetic universe, etc.), or the inverse […]’ is fairly typical. The diegetic universe is the fictional universe – Narnia and Discworld are clear examples, but most works of art and fiction present their own world. The extradiegetic universe is one that is different from the fictional one. So metalepsis takes place when a story’s author intrudes their comments within the story, or when the artist’s hand suddenly appears in a comic strip in The Beano transgressing the boundary between the narrative world and the physical world.

Master of the Revels: Magritte

This Magritte painting is an example of taking it further – the movement between fictional worlds and different realities.

At the ‘Creating Second Lives’ conference, Astrid Ensslin began to explore the connections of metalepsis with the conference theme of ‘Blurring the Boundaries’.

Lots of ideas – too many for me to note down during the presentation. They include ‘participatory metalepsis’such as cosplay and fan fiction, and the ‘avatar as a metaleptic vehicle’ that takes us into a different world.

Two themes emerging for me – one about paratexts (the texts that arise around digital media, such as walkthroughs, cheat guides and fan fiction) and about ‘parapractices’ (a term I’ve just invented to cover cosplay — I’m sure there are more examples). Also the theme of the wish to move between the worlds – to bring our avatar into real life, or to move with our avatar into the virtual world (see Liberate Your Avatar for an example of this).

Palindrome Intermedia performance group

You can see them in action at http://www.palindrome.de/

We had two performances by this group, who use motion tracking software and a host of other gadgetry to foreground the ways in which human conversation involves a host of other things beside words. Eye motions, body position, movement, they’re all involved.

So sound and dance and movement and visuals are all brought together. And it looks good. On paper.

Can’t say I took much from it, except a reinforced consciousness of how many real world cues are lost when you move online. On the other hand, they’re probably replaced by a host of other cues. There’s a paper in there somewhere about the myriad social cues available in an online conference.

I’m going to create a new blog category – papers that could be written and I’ll never get round to…

Community or settlement?

I’m still puzzling over the big issue for Internet community research ethics. Is what we see online a virtual identity,which should be treated according to the ethical standards of human subject research, or is it published text, in which case the relevant ethical standards relate to copyright and acknowledgement?

Quentin Jones article on cyber settlements and online comunities perhaps points a way forward here. In an online community people have identities, in a cyber settlement you find artefacts. It’s a subtle distinction, but I think it’s useful.

For example, in ‘my’ conference. If I look at how many people posted attachments in week three, or how many replies there were compared with new threads, I’d be looking at the artefacts of a cyber settlement. If I look at the content of the postings I’m looking at the online community.

Embodied

I’m trying to decide whether the words in my conference are embodied or not. It’s surprisingly difficult. Is Santa embodied? What about heavens? Or mind? I’m writing this, so is writing embodied?

The distinction between virtual and real isn’t very clear when you come to think of it.

I guess all abstract nouns are virtual: goodness, health, opinion. But they’re pre-technology virtual. So health is abstract and therefore virtual, but it’s also embodied most of the time.

The Ancient Greeks used to personify all abstract nouns as gods. I guess if they’d been around today there’d have been a range of gods in the pantheon representing email and virtual community. This idea has been taken up to a certain extent by the Catholic church, where abstract nouns get patrons saints. I note that Saint Isidore of Seville is the proposed saint of Internet users despite his having died in the seventh century.

 OK, I’m rambling, enough already.