Monthly Archives: February 2006

Research questions (10.11.05)

I’m reading a report by Bonk and Wisher on collaborative and e-learning tools.
http://publicationshare.com/docs/Dist.Learn(Wisher).pdf
They identify the following questions, most of which seem to originate in Chao’s unpublished thesis.

I like question 8 about the development of trust and openness.

1. What conditions foster online learning communities? What social structures must be in place?
2. At what point does the learner or participant become part of the community?
3. How can CMC environments substitute for the social cues of FTF environments that help foster a sense of community?
4. When and how do students develop a sense of online communities within both training and higher education classes? What principles, practices, and tools spur the growth of learning communities?
5. How does the development of a learning community relate to student perceptions of course tasks and activities?
6. Does the formation of new relationships relate to the depth of student learning?
7. How do instructor styles, student experiences with e-learning, and course materials contribute to the development of an online community?
8. How do such characteristics as trust, support, openness, knowledge sharing, negotiation of meaning, and influence emerge and evolve?
9. How do permanent learning communities differ from temporary classroom-based learning communities?
10. Why do people use a site? Why do new people join the asynchronous learning network? What motivates their participation? What are their expectations?

In addition to the questions above, it is important to understand the tools that positively impact the sharing of information and mutual understanding of participants. How do online tools provide a shared social space for instructor and student interaction? Just how do participants share knowledge and experience? What must be present in the learning community for significant knowledge negotiation?

Gill commented on this: Just an idea that bounced off my head as I read this – one of the aspects of mobile learning that I was quite keen to pursue was collaborative learning. However at the moment, I’m not so sure. The little pilot study I did for U800 into how experienced PDA and Smartphone users use their mobile devices to support their informal learning projects assumed that because of the high levels of connectivity that people would engage in some forms of collaborative learning.

At first glance, this did not seem to be the case. Learners (such as students) who were all engaged in the same subject and in the same physical location did collaborate, sharing information by beaming. Other learners only collaborated via web forums – posting problems and helping each other out.

For the most part, the informal learning projects supported by mobile devices seemed fairly solitary unless people were also co-located physically.

Maybe you need a framework in place to promote and support collaborative learning.

Gill
Comment from euphloozie – 18/11/05 09:41

Online community (9.11.05)

Chao designed a categorisation scheme for online communities in 1999.

S/he based this on McMillan and Chavis’s definition, which suggests s/he felt that online communities are like offline communities. I wonder if that’s the case. Is anything online the same as it is offline? Anyway Chao looks at the four categories like this:

Membership – self-disclosure statement, acknowledging others’ membership, the paying of dues in terms of time and energy, references to the boundaries of the community, completing forms needed to become a member.
This suggests active, posting membership. Are lurkers not part of the community? How often would you have to post in this way to maintain your community membership?

Influence – refer to norms, rules or other orders, attempting to influence others, being influenced by others, identifying and trusting some authority.
Mmm, yes, OK

Fulfilment of individual needs: seeking common ground, expressing a personal needed, acknowledging receipt of needed info, voicing criticisms, suggestions or differences of opinion.
I think I’m least happy with this because surely there are communities you belong to by default and others you are a member because you are required to be.

Sharing events and emotional experiences – stories of the past, using special symbols / language
I suppose you could also include use of hotlinks in here. Maybe also threading. Evidence that users have looked at the archive?

Bonk, Wisher and Nigrelli (9.11.05)

I’m reading Bonk, Wisher and Nigrelli in Karen’s book on communities of learners.

They take their definition of communities from McMillan and Chavis in 1986. M and C reckon there are for key elements to a sense of community:
membership – sense of belonging, community boundaries, identity and personal investment.
influence – influencing the community, being influenced by the community. Pressure for uniformity and conformity.
fulfillment of individual needs – provide rewards and reinforcers. These are critical to staying within the community.
shared events and emotional connections – from shared histories that connect members and encourage ongoing involvement. Hang on, though, doesn’t that imply that a community must have some history before it becomes a community? At what point, then, does the community form?

McMillan D.W. and Chavis D.M. (1986) Sense of community: A definition and theory Journal of Community Psychology 14 6-23

This seems to be a very positive sense of community – surely a community is also defined by what it is not – by the non-members as well as the members. Does it also have pressures to keep you in the community as well as rewards? Didn’t Foucault have something to say on this topic?

Getting new members (9.11.05)

It proves really complicated to get Anesa and Gill into my blog. This blog’s too private, and if I go via blogger.com that becomes too public.

I could pay for web hosting and host it myself, but that seems like a lot of money to do something that should be fairly simple.

Wonder if we could interest the OU in setting up a research blog site?

9.11.05 Anesa commented
Hi Rebecca … got in and read your entries so far … at least you have research question!!! Lot more than what I have at the moment :).

10.11.05 Gill commented
It did seem complicated, however in retrospect, we’ve achieved it in only 24 hours, and we weren’t trying for all of that time. I spent some time investigating a variety of PhP bulletin board type applications that I could host on my own website, but came to the conclusion that they were all too complicated for our needs.

10.6.05 Gill commented
I’ve just read Anesa’s comment (and marvelled at the fact that she can use her own name as a Screen Name whereas I’m obliged to go for some whacky pseudonym because there are a million other Gill Clough’s). And I thought I was unique.

I now realise that this is Rebecca’s own research blog, but reading Anesa’s comment about not having a firm research question resounded with me. Bearing in mind the success of these web-based forums that I’ve been researching in my investigations into informal learning using mobile devices, I suspect that a group blog would be helpful to us in a similar way. We could use it for bouncing ideas, for requests for help (like “How do I submit an expenses form” or “Anybody remember how to purchase non-elective software”). We would then have a written record that we could check back on.

I’m going to try to create a group blog for the three of us using this AOL messaging system. It might provide some interesting material for analysis. We could even present it somewhere – a group PhD blog from people doing dissimilar subjects must be of interest.

In the end, I simply signed myself up with AOL’s AIM (AOL Instant Messenger) to obtain what they call a “Screen name” and Rebecca added me to this blog. Anesa already had an online ID that was acceptable to AOL. Had I done that at the start, we’d have all been online within an hour.

Now…..what to do with our group blog …

Hmmmmm.

Research question (9.11.05)

OK, here is the first ever formulation of my PhD research question (after I ditched the original idea about international communities in primary schools).

How do people successfully become members of an online learning community?

And the sub-quesion: ‘What problems and limitations stand in the way of successful membership?

Dave Wield suggested formulating the question in different ways, so here goes:
Why… do people have problems when forming online learning communities?
Where… are the most successful online learning communites found?
When… does a successful online learning community form?
How… do people become successful members of online learning communities?
What if… I had to design an ideal online learning community?

Starting Out (9.11.05)

I was at Dave Wield’s U500 seminar on research methodology yesterday, and remembered how crucial research journals are. Thought I’d take a break from the one for my Masters and start once again.

Some things to do: Talk to Gill about publishing something about research blogs. Could we run a WIP on this and then try to knock it into shape as a joint article?
What would reflexive blogging involve? Is all blogging necessarily reflexive?

Email Tamuna t.shengelia to tell her who wrote the thesis on Dolly the Sheep.
Find Linda’s email address and then ask her for the intro on her dissertation – the bit on what communities are and the associated bibliography.

Linda is thinking about research on cultural events and social capital. She might be interested in talking to Daniel?

Investigate moderating opportunities at the Open University.

Look out C Wright Mills’ book On Intellectual Craftsmanship