Role models (17.11.05)

Burnett says: ‘ part of the “different flavour” of a given community can be seen in the particular norms and pattern of acceptable behaviours within the community. That is, each community emphasises its own particular patterns of interaction, and sets its own norms and expectations.’

That’s fairly obvious, I guess, but it fits in with the idea of tutors and experienced students modelling behaviour at the start so that the community gets off to a good start.

Of course, that assumes that the tutor and the experienced students have had good experiences before. Are there any models of successful virtual communities that are archived for people to look at?

What sort of training do you have to go on to become a moderator for a course?

Gill commented:
I’d recommend Gilly Salmon’s book entitled E-moderating. There’s a copy on my bookshelf if you fancy borring it 🙂

Gill
Comment from euphloozie – 18/11/05 09:29

Border lines (17.11.05)

Anesa’s thinking about where the borders of linear programming lie. I’m thinking about where the borders are on virtual communities.

A lot of people I read (I’m reading Gary Burnett on information exchange in virtual communites, at the moment) characterise a virtual community as what you see happening online. It’s the people posting and it’s what they post.

The community has a lot of subsets: newbies, who are just getting the hang of it; members, who have taken a recognised part in a sizeable and interesting thread, lurkers who are hidden away on the fringes.

However Katz (Luring the lurkers – archived on slashdot) argues that the online stuff is just the tip of the iceberg and that you don’t understand a virtual community at all if you only look at how it interacts in public.

For him, many lurkers are interested parties who are often willing and able to communicate on a one-to-one basis but are not happy with the risks and costraints of posting to the whole community. Katz’s piece may be grey literature but it’s a really useful view of lurking.

Katz also says that, while the public face of what happens in his blog is that there is an enormous amount of flaming in fact, hidden from the public gaze, is a huge amount of one-to-one supportive and helpful communication.

Ruth Brown (see below. (Must post more notes on her article.)) also looks at the extension of the community away from the public forum. For her, the top membership level of a virtual community are those people who are communicating away from the public forum – the ones who are emailing each other, ringing each other and meeting face to face.

Posting length (17.11.05)

I’m thinking about the role of posting length in building a virtual community. I think that long postings put people off, because they look carefully constructed and full of information – they are more difficult to read and they are intimidating because they appear to show that the poster has thought about and knows about the subject.

Posting length is an interesting thing about blogging, because I tend to blog a couple of hundred words. If I want to see more I add another post. I know that’s not how all blogs work, but it works for me, and it makes my thoughts easier to review when I go back though my blog, as information and thoughts are split up.

Perhaps online tutors and experienced community members should model short, speech-like exchanges to encourage students to become involved in virtual communities.

If too many postings are too short, though, it also becomes a pain to read because it stretches endlessly down the page or you have to click to umpteen postings and they’re all fairly boring.

And what about thread length? If a thread is very short, that suggests it’s either new or it’s not very interesting. On the other hand, if a thread is very long it’s off-putting because there is just TOO MUCH INFORMATION. I’m in a virtual community that currently has a thread purposefuly set up to be the longest thread on the community. It’s all light-hearted and amusing and each individual part is easy to read, but 356 postings and counting? Puh-lease!

And what is the role of small talk in virtual learning communities? On the one hand it’s useful because it gets people talking, makes it easier and less threatening to post, promotes knowledge of members of the community. On the other hand, if you have limited time you want to cut to the chase – you don’t want endless discussion of the traffic on the M25 that morning, or of people whose budgie has just died.

Gill commented:
Although while I was doing the H80* online courses, the topic of cats was so popular I think we ended up with a discussion or conference dedicated almost entirely to it.

What does that say about us I wonder….

Gill
Comment from euphloozie – 18/11/05 09:36

Being in the in-crowd (16.11.05)

I seem to read a lot about the positive aspects of communities, virtual comunities and learning communities. What are the negative aspects? Has anyone looked at them?

Real-world communities often define themselves in terms of the other, in terms of what they are not. Is that true of online communities? Do online communities do that but with a much smaller population? Of the people who have signed in, and are nominally members, some are the in-crowd, some are on the fringes and a lot (the majority?) are a silent, lurking group who can be construed in negative terms – too lazy to post, too stupid to post, taking but not giving, a threatening presence, a judging presence…

I guess we all lurk in some communities, however briefly, so lurking has benefits for those who do it. Jumping straight into a community and posting without a period of lurking would usually be a mistake, so growing communities do need lurkers.

Should a community have a system for pulling lurkers in towards the centre? For example, on FirstClass, lurking individuals could be addressed directly because their identitiy is available in the message history. This would probably happen in a successful real-world learning community – those who sit quietly on the fringes are usually invited to give an opinion or speak at some time.

Online community building (16.11.05)

I’ve just been reading

Brown, R. E. (2001)

The process of community-building in distance learning classes

JALN Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5, 18-35.

I have problems with the beginning of the article which is very bitty – particularly when the author defines her terms. However, it is a useful grounded account of the growth of a learning community. She identifies several benefits of a virtual learning community:

Benefits of a virtual learning community

* Overcomes feelings of being alone
* Can affect student satisfaction, retention and learning
* Possibility of continuing when course is over (this benefit doesn’t seem to be taken up)
* Community as resource university can draw on it for fundraising, recruitment
* Students responsible for their own learning & the learning of others
* Gain confidence in ability to express self
* Gain confidence in ability to express with intelligent people
* Learn from and about others in class
* Feel connected to class members
* Feel accepted into the community
* Feel worthy of membership
* Pass on feelings of validation and acceptance to others
* Genuine sense of belonging
* Lifelong/continuing friends

I think what she’s focused on here are the community aspects and she has, perhaps, ignored what it means to be a learning community. There’s nothing about building knowledge together – about challenging each other’s views or about constructive criticism.

Research questions (10.11.05)

I’m reading a report by Bonk and Wisher on collaborative and e-learning tools.
http://publicationshare.com/docs/Dist.Learn(Wisher).pdf
They identify the following questions, most of which seem to originate in Chao’s unpublished thesis.

I like question 8 about the development of trust and openness.

1. What conditions foster online learning communities? What social structures must be in place?
2. At what point does the learner or participant become part of the community?
3. How can CMC environments substitute for the social cues of FTF environments that help foster a sense of community?
4. When and how do students develop a sense of online communities within both training and higher education classes? What principles, practices, and tools spur the growth of learning communities?
5. How does the development of a learning community relate to student perceptions of course tasks and activities?
6. Does the formation of new relationships relate to the depth of student learning?
7. How do instructor styles, student experiences with e-learning, and course materials contribute to the development of an online community?
8. How do such characteristics as trust, support, openness, knowledge sharing, negotiation of meaning, and influence emerge and evolve?
9. How do permanent learning communities differ from temporary classroom-based learning communities?
10. Why do people use a site? Why do new people join the asynchronous learning network? What motivates their participation? What are their expectations?

In addition to the questions above, it is important to understand the tools that positively impact the sharing of information and mutual understanding of participants. How do online tools provide a shared social space for instructor and student interaction? Just how do participants share knowledge and experience? What must be present in the learning community for significant knowledge negotiation?

Gill commented on this: Just an idea that bounced off my head as I read this – one of the aspects of mobile learning that I was quite keen to pursue was collaborative learning. However at the moment, I’m not so sure. The little pilot study I did for U800 into how experienced PDA and Smartphone users use their mobile devices to support their informal learning projects assumed that because of the high levels of connectivity that people would engage in some forms of collaborative learning.

At first glance, this did not seem to be the case. Learners (such as students) who were all engaged in the same subject and in the same physical location did collaborate, sharing information by beaming. Other learners only collaborated via web forums – posting problems and helping each other out.

For the most part, the informal learning projects supported by mobile devices seemed fairly solitary unless people were also co-located physically.

Maybe you need a framework in place to promote and support collaborative learning.

Gill
Comment from euphloozie – 18/11/05 09:41

Online community (9.11.05)

Chao designed a categorisation scheme for online communities in 1999.

S/he based this on McMillan and Chavis’s definition, which suggests s/he felt that online communities are like offline communities. I wonder if that’s the case. Is anything online the same as it is offline? Anyway Chao looks at the four categories like this:

Membership – self-disclosure statement, acknowledging others’ membership, the paying of dues in terms of time and energy, references to the boundaries of the community, completing forms needed to become a member.
This suggests active, posting membership. Are lurkers not part of the community? How often would you have to post in this way to maintain your community membership?

Influence – refer to norms, rules or other orders, attempting to influence others, being influenced by others, identifying and trusting some authority.
Mmm, yes, OK

Fulfilment of individual needs: seeking common ground, expressing a personal needed, acknowledging receipt of needed info, voicing criticisms, suggestions or differences of opinion.
I think I’m least happy with this because surely there are communities you belong to by default and others you are a member because you are required to be.

Sharing events and emotional experiences – stories of the past, using special symbols / language
I suppose you could also include use of hotlinks in here. Maybe also threading. Evidence that users have looked at the archive?

Bonk, Wisher and Nigrelli (9.11.05)

I’m reading Bonk, Wisher and Nigrelli in Karen’s book on communities of learners.

They take their definition of communities from McMillan and Chavis in 1986. M and C reckon there are for key elements to a sense of community:
membership – sense of belonging, community boundaries, identity and personal investment.
influence – influencing the community, being influenced by the community. Pressure for uniformity and conformity.
fulfillment of individual needs – provide rewards and reinforcers. These are critical to staying within the community.
shared events and emotional connections – from shared histories that connect members and encourage ongoing involvement. Hang on, though, doesn’t that imply that a community must have some history before it becomes a community? At what point, then, does the community form?

McMillan D.W. and Chavis D.M. (1986) Sense of community: A definition and theory Journal of Community Psychology 14 6-23

This seems to be a very positive sense of community – surely a community is also defined by what it is not – by the non-members as well as the members. Does it also have pressures to keep you in the community as well as rewards? Didn’t Foucault have something to say on this topic?

Getting new members (9.11.05)

It proves really complicated to get Anesa and Gill into my blog. This blog’s too private, and if I go via blogger.com that becomes too public.

I could pay for web hosting and host it myself, but that seems like a lot of money to do something that should be fairly simple.

Wonder if we could interest the OU in setting up a research blog site?

9.11.05 Anesa commented
Hi Rebecca … got in and read your entries so far … at least you have research question!!! Lot more than what I have at the moment :).

10.11.05 Gill commented
It did seem complicated, however in retrospect, we’ve achieved it in only 24 hours, and we weren’t trying for all of that time. I spent some time investigating a variety of PhP bulletin board type applications that I could host on my own website, but came to the conclusion that they were all too complicated for our needs.

10.6.05 Gill commented
I’ve just read Anesa’s comment (and marvelled at the fact that she can use her own name as a Screen Name whereas I’m obliged to go for some whacky pseudonym because there are a million other Gill Clough’s). And I thought I was unique.

I now realise that this is Rebecca’s own research blog, but reading Anesa’s comment about not having a firm research question resounded with me. Bearing in mind the success of these web-based forums that I’ve been researching in my investigations into informal learning using mobile devices, I suspect that a group blog would be helpful to us in a similar way. We could use it for bouncing ideas, for requests for help (like “How do I submit an expenses form” or “Anybody remember how to purchase non-elective software”). We would then have a written record that we could check back on.

I’m going to try to create a group blog for the three of us using this AOL messaging system. It might provide some interesting material for analysis. We could even present it somewhere – a group PhD blog from people doing dissimilar subjects must be of interest.

In the end, I simply signed myself up with AOL’s AIM (AOL Instant Messenger) to obtain what they call a “Screen name” and Rebecca added me to this blog. Anesa already had an online ID that was acceptable to AOL. Had I done that at the start, we’d have all been online within an hour.

Now…..what to do with our group blog …

Hmmmmm.

Research question (9.11.05)

OK, here is the first ever formulation of my PhD research question (after I ditched the original idea about international communities in primary schools).

How do people successfully become members of an online learning community?

And the sub-quesion: ‘What problems and limitations stand in the way of successful membership?

Dave Wield suggested formulating the question in different ways, so here goes:
Why… do people have problems when forming online learning communities?
Where… are the most successful online learning communites found?
When… does a successful online learning community form?
How… do people become successful members of online learning communities?
What if… I had to design an ideal online learning community?