Skip to primary content

Engaging Research

An Open Research University: Embedding public engagement within the research culture of the OU

Engaging Research

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Engaging opportunities
    • Giving public lectures about research
      • School-University Lectures 2016
      • School-University Lectures 2015
      • School-university lectures 2014
      • School-University Lectures 2013
    • How to organise a research café
      • Possible topics for research cafés
    • Communicating partnerships creatively
    • Resources
    • People
  • An open research university
    • 2015 Engaging Research Award Scheme
      • 2014 Engaging Research Award Scheme
    • Participation Now
    • Evidencing Engaged Research
    • People
  • Resources
    • Digital practices of engaged researchers
    • Snakes and Ladders of Social Media
    • Designing public-centric forms of public engagement with research
    • Evidencing impacts from engaged research
      • Collecting evidence from research-informed practices
      • Juxtalearn: capturing engagement processes
      • Special Educational Needs: The impact of key working
    • School-University Engagement
      • Planning for school-university engagement
      • Open Lectures
      • Open Dialogues
      • Open Inquiry
      • Open Creativity
    • Reports, publications, posts
    • Researching and Practicising Science Communication
    • Postgraduate Science Resources: Open Learn
  • NERC Training
  • Contact

Post navigation

← Previous Next →

Engaging Research: from trainee to trainer

Posted on Tuesday, 28 March 2017 by Richard Holliman
Lucy Garrett, University of Birmingham and Dr Kate Baker, University of Exeter

Lucy Garrett, University of Birmingham and Dr Kate Baker, University of Exeter

As participants of the first set of NERC-funded workshops on engaging research in 2015, we were delighted to hear that Richard Holliman and Clare Warren were repeating the workshops at the Open University and wanted us to return as trainers.

It was back in 2015 that we attended the course, learning how to communicate our research more effectively and how to engage stakeholders with our research. This included spending time experimenting with language and using metaphors to explain what our research was about and who could use it in outside of academia.

It was the first time that many of us spent quality time thinking about how our research could be engaged with other researchers, NGOs and industry; an exchange of knowledge that would improve our research quality and increase the impact of our work.

Week 1: l-r, Melanie Stone, Kate Newton, Eleni Wood, Richard Holliman, Rosalinde Nicholls, David Pettifer, Stacy Phillips, Clare Warren, Jasmine Wareham, Slawomir Michniewski, Lucy Garrett, Kate Baker, Janet  Sumner, Gerard Giorgi-Coll and Chris Nedza. Photo: Gareth Davies.

Week 1: l-r, Melanie Stone, Kate Newton, Eleni Wood, Richard Holliman, Rosalinde Nicholls, David Pettifer, Stacy Phillips, Clare Warren, Jasmine Wareham, Slawomir Michniewski, Lucy Garrett, Kate Baker, Janet Sumner, Gerard Giorgi-Coll and Chris Nedza. Photo: Gareth Davies.

Dr Kate Baker, University of Exeter

Dr Kate Baker, University of Exeter

Kate Baker
For me, the initial workshop where I attended as a participant gave me confidence to pursue some side line projects, including making films of my research and building up Intrepid Explorers, a platform created for researchers to share experiences and learning from the field.

Since the course, I have now completed my PhD and I’m working as a Research Fellow at Exeter University in the Centre for Water Systems with a significant part of my workload assisting with the industrial dissemination strategy of an EPSRC fellowship.

Returning to the Open University as a trainer on the engaging research workshop was another productive and wholesome experience. I learnt a lot from working ‘behind the scenes’, observing how Rick and Clare created a varied schedule which meant students had to use, and learn, a variety of skills – including debating, presenting, engaging their research, communicating, story-telling, filming, and interviewing.

As trainers, we were given preparatory training, where we were introduced to the course and given ‘top tips’ on how deliver information in a meaningful way.

During the course, there was time to develop our facilitation skills and have fun helping the PhD students create films about their research. Below is a link to one of the films the postgraduate researchers produced.

Lucy Garrett, University of Birmingham

Lucy Garrett, University of Birmingham

Lucy Garrett
I can’t quite believe that a whole two years have passed since we initially undertook the engaged researcher training at the Open University. Taking part in the course again, from the ‘other side’ really highlighted to me how influential the course has been throughout my PhD.

Some of the things that stand out as having had a lasting and continual impression on the way I approach and undertake engagement are an increase in confidence in explaining my research to a varied and wide ranging audience. I feel that I have developed a greater understanding of what engagement is and how to tailor the types of engagement activities I undertake to my future aspirations and development.

Lastly, the confidence that I have gained through the course and since undertaking it, has meant that I am not afraid to take on new opportunities and push myself outside of my comfort zone, which has led to some really exciting developments and collaborations during my PhD.

Acting as a trainer on the course was a great experience, and I hope that our experiences, two years on, were useful for the new participants who were at the early stages of their PhDs.

Having put the course into action, I felt that I could really add to the information which was presented by Clare and Rick during the course in a meaningful way.

An engaging thesis; a good or bad suggestion?

‘An Engaging Thesis‘; a good or bad suggestion?

A particular favourite moment for me was being the bad-cop to Kate’s good cop in a hustings debate on ‘An Engaging Thesis‘ – the idea being that part of your thesis should include a chapter or section on the impact and dissemination of your research through engagement activities. I think both sides of the argument have their points and I guess time will tell if it materialises.

Whether or not engagement becomes a formalised part of your thesis, I still believe that it is an essential part of a PhD, and I hope that the attendees on the course are able to put their new skills into action, which judging from the talent they showed at presenting their research on camera, I’m sure they will!

Below is a link to one of the films the postgraduate researchers produced.


Acknowledgements
The professional development workshops discussed in this paper were funded by NERC through an Innovation Award (NE/L002493/1). Victoria Burton (Imperial College), Kerry Reid (Open University) and Georgia Hole (University of Oxford) helped to deliver the second and third the three workshops, respectively. We are particularly grateful to Sara Kinahan, Liz Lomas and Michelle Aitken for their support in developing and organising these workshops.

Where relevant we have drawn on research findings and experiences from other similar workshops funded through an award made as part of the RCUK Public Engagement with Research Catalysts (EP/J020087/1) and a further award made through the RCUK School University Partnership Initiative (EP/K027786/1).

This entry was posted in Communication, Training and tagged Blogging, climate change, engaging research, Media, NCCPE, NERC, postgraduate research, Public engagement with research, rock cycle, Web video by Richard Holliman. Bookmark the permalink.
Proudly powered by WordPress