Skip to primary content
Skip to secondary content

Engaging Research

An Open Research University: Embedding public engagement within the research culture of the OU

Engaging Research

Main menu

  • Home
  • About
  • Engaging opportunities
    • Giving public lectures about research
      • School-University Lectures 2016
      • School-University Lectures 2015
      • School-university lectures 2014
      • School-University Lectures 2013
    • How to organise a research café
      • Possible topics for research cafés
    • Communicating partnerships creatively
    • Resources
    • People
  • An open research university
    • 2015 Engaging Research Award Scheme
      • 2014 Engaging Research Award Scheme
    • Participation Now
    • Evidencing Engaged Research
    • People
  • Resources
    • Digital practices of engaged researchers
    • Snakes and Ladders of Social Media
    • Designing public-centric forms of public engagement with research
    • Evidencing impacts from engaged research
      • Collecting evidence from research-informed practices
      • Juxtalearn: capturing engagement processes
      • Special Educational Needs: The impact of key working
    • School-University Engagement
      • Planning for school-university engagement
      • Open Lectures
      • Open Dialogues
      • Open Inquiry
      • Open Creativity
    • Reports, publications, posts
    • Researching and Practicising Science Communication
    • Postgraduate Science Resources: Open Learn
  • NERC Training
  • Contact

Category Archives: Evaluation

Post navigation

Newer posts →

Assessing seed funding applications

Posted on Wednesday, 19 March 2014 by Richard Holliman
Dr Richard Holliman, Chair of the Review Panel

Dr Richard Holliman, Chair of the Review Panel

Evidencing Engaged Research: The closing date for applications has passed and we are not accepting further applications.

Contact
Dr Richard Holliman, Chair of the Review Panel.
Fiona McKerlie, Secretary to the Review Panel.

Purpose of this call: To support active researchers in the generation and systematic collection of evidence of the impacts from engaged research, demonstrating effects, changes and/or mutual benefits to those participating.

Continue reading →

Posted in Evaluation, Projects | Tagged An open research university, Catalyst, catalyst project, culture change, PER Catalyst, Public engagement with research

Post navigation

Newer posts →

Categories

Recent Posts

  • Denbigh Geography students help to map future research priorities
  • Talking hay while the sun shines
  • Identifying, disentangling and reflecting on traditions in science communication
  • Denbigh School students ‘sow the seeds’ for future urban tree research
  • Three tales from the riverbank

Archives

Blogroll

  • NCCPE: Exploring how universities engage with the public
  • Nottingham University: Making science public
  • Open University: Creating publics
  • QMUL Engagement Blog

Other stuff

  • Log in
  • Entries feed
  • Comments feed
  • WordPress.org
Proudly powered by WordPress