Dr Dave McGarvie is a Senior Lecturer in the Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Faculty at The Open University.
He is a volcanologist with an international reputation, researching little-known volcanoes in Iceland and Chile, to build knowledge bases that help evaluation of hazards from future eruptions.
Towering over 2km above coastal plains, Iceland’s highest volcano Öræfajökull is a majestic sight. Its upper half is covered in ice that feeds valley glaciers that can be easily accessed. Tourists and filmmakers love it.
Since June 2017, there have been “swarms” of small earthquakes in the region. Earthquakes are rare at Öræfajökull, so these have prompted meetings between locals, scientists and civil protection authorities.
The unusual activity may indicate a reawakening of Öræfajökull, so it is timely to review previous eruptions and the potential effects of a future eruption.
"Two women and a boy took refuge on the roof … but it was carried away by the deluge of water, and as far as the eye could reach, the three unfortunate persons were seen clinging to the roof. One of the women was afterwards found among the mud of the jökulhlaup [Icelandic term for meltwater flood], but burnt, and as it were parboild; her body was so damaged and tender, but it could scarcely be touched."
This is an eyewitness account of three fatalities during the last eruption (1727) of Öræfajökull. It was a relatively small eruption.
The previous eruption in 1362, however, remains Iceland’s largest explosive eruption since the island was settled about 1,100 years ago.
This time, thick deposits of pumice and ash (also known as tephra) covered the volcano, while sailors at the time reported pumice floating “in such masses that ships could hardly make their way through it”.
Ash from the 1362 eruption has been found in Greenland and western Europe recently.
We first studied the volcano (pictured above right) in 2001-2002. Our two main findings were that it has a variety of eruption styles and a surprising abundance of lavas known as rhyolites. We know that this can erupt very explosively – as it did in 1362.
To better understand the 1362 eruption, we have also mapped deposits preserved on the volcano.
The main implication of our study is that explosive eruptions at Öræfajökull can be complicated.
The most powerful phase with the highest plume and widest ash dispersal was probably short-lived (lasting from a few hours to a few days), but there were other stages before and after it with varying degrees of explosivity.
Locally, the eruption was devastating. Rich farmland at the foot of the volcano was covered by thick tephra deposits and swept by pyroclastic flows (fast-moving current of hot gas and volcanic matter).
The area was abandoned and renamed “Öræfi” (wasteland). Originally called Hnappafellsjökull, the volcano was renamed Öræfajökull.
Excavations of abandoned farms show buildings had collapsed prior to the tephra fall and, despite evidence of prosperity, virtually nothing valuable was left behind. Also, no corpses were found.
Inhabitants of these farms realised they were in danger, packed their belongings, and left. Large earthquakes then destroyed the buildings before the eruption started.
The Icelandic volcano Eyjafjallajökull erupted in 2010, causing a lot of problems to air travel across Europe.
Would a repeat of the 1362 eruption cause Eyjafjallajökull 2010-style disruption? No.
Its eruption lasted for weeks, with the wind often blowing towards Europe, and aircraft attempted to “avoid all ash”.
Since then, improvements to volcanic ash cloud detection and simulation have been made. Revised procedures at the regulators and airlines allow planes to fly where low concentrations of ash may be present.
A repeat of the 1362 eruption would disperse ash widely, but our results suggest this stage would be short-lived.
Other scenarios, like lava erupting beneath the ice, may be longer lasting but any disruption would be more localised.
There are farming communities in the area but these have learned from the 1727 eruption and have relocated their farms from the glacier outlets.
Before the small 1727 eruption, earthquake shocks terrified the people, which suggests that big earthquakes might provide warning of the next eruption and allow time for evacuation.
One of the biggest concerns would be the large number of tourists in the area – especially in summer.
Nearby Skaftafell is Iceland’s seventh most popular tourist destination. However, it lies outside the flood pathways of both the 1362 and 1727 eruptions.
It’s impossible to estimate exactly when Öræfajökull will next erupt. She may just be turning over in her sleep, soon to return to quiet slumber.
Icelandic scientists recently installed additional earthquake monitoring equipment: with their acknowledged expertise in eruption monitoring they will provide the best possible information should Öræfajökull fully awaken.
This blog has been edited from a co-authored article that was originally published by The Conversation.
Dr Dave McGarvie will be discussing his ongoing research in Iceland and Chile at a meeting of the Royal Statistical Society in Edinburgh on 28 November, 2017.
OU in Scotland Media Relations:
Call 0131 549 7986
OU UK Press Office:
Call 01908 654316
07901 515 891
Sign up for our quarterly e-newsletter, Open Outlook.