Category Archives: question analysis

Problems with fractions

I’ve been aware for some time that Open University science students have problems with fractions (and many things that express themselves as difficulties in other areas e.g. working out units, simplifying algebraic expressions, have their origins in poor understanding of the … Continue reading

Posted in mathematical misunderstandings, question analysis | Tagged , , | 1 Comment

The significance of rounding and significant figures

I now find myself chairing the production of two new Open University modules, so writing course materials ought to take priority over writing this blog. That’s a pity, because there’s so much assessment-related that I want to reflect on. As a compromise, I’ve … Continue reading

Posted in mathematical misunderstandings, question analysis | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

to two significant figures

I know I keep banging on about the importance of monitoring your questions when they are ‘out there’, being used by students. If what follows appears to be a bit of a trick (and in a sense it is), it’s a trick with … Continue reading

Posted in Computers as Social Actors, question analysis, significant figures | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

Can formative-only assignments tell you about student misunderstandings?

When I was doing the original analysis of student responses to Maths for Science assessment questions, I concentrated on questions that had been used summatively and also on questions that required students to input an answer rather than selecting a … Continue reading

Posted in mathematical misunderstandings, question analysis, student engagement | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

More about units

OpenMark e-assessment questions were used for the first time in a little 10-credit module called Maths for Science  that has been running since 2002. I did some analysis years ago into the mistakes that students make, but I’m about to … Continue reading

Posted in mathematical misunderstandings, question analysis, units | Tagged , , | 3 Comments