We welcome comments, views, reflections, and opinions in our blogs and reviews pages on what you have heard, seen and considered from attending our conference. Please email through any short blogs (max 400 words) to firstname.lastname@example.org and we will add these to this section.
We are also pleased to announce we will randomly select one contributor on 31st March to receive a FREE annual subscription to the Journal of Widening Participation and Lifelong Learning. You can find out more about the Journal, such as how to subsribe or submit articles to it by visiting our website.
By Professor John Butcher, Director Access, Open and Cross-curricula Innovation, The Open University
Casting my mind back to the sunlit uplands prior to March 2020, I fondly recall the biennial Easter WP conferences organised by the Open University (declaration of interest, the latter organised by my colleagues). There were others of course, like the annual summer Forum for Access and Continuing Education (FACE) conference, and numerous one day events like the regular Action on Access event in London. I enjoyed attending them, pleased to share my research with an audience, to network with like-minded colleagues and to learn what other institutions were doing to widen participation. I was lucky enough to attend conferences in Europe and the US, gaining greatly through interactions with colleagues working in very different policy contexts.
However, writing this after working from home for almost a year, and having become a seasoned user of Microsoft Teams, or Skype for Business, or Zoom (other platforms are available), I reflect on a small conundrum: why researchers and practitioners did not grasp the inclusivity and cost-savings and green practices of remote conferencing before. Face-to face conferences are (necessarily) expensive to attend. Organisers must book conference rooms and provide overnight accommodation and catering. Attendees are forced to seek sparse institutional funding or pay for themselves. This is intrinsically unfair, with senior academics more likely to be able to access funding, whereas early researchers or WP practitioners have inevitably faced institutional obstacles before financial support can be assumed. Colleagues across the UK often had to take a day out of work to travel (especially if assumptions were made about start times in London). And don’t get me started about the impact of hundreds of attendees on carbon emissions.
So, I wonder about two things as I am about to receive my first vaccination: has lockdown resulted in a diminution of research and scholarship activity around WP? Has lockdown reduced sector engagement in WP research findings via conference dissemination?
Well, not in my world. In previous years, at the OU we would have attracted up to 50 colleagues to an externally advertised OU seminar on WP and been pleased to see that many (they were free). This year, forced to shift our planned seminar programme to online delivery, we organised a half-day session addressing the black awarding gap. We were so inundated with colleagues keen to share their research we had to put on two additional events. The eventual series of three half-day seminars attracted around 250 participants to each – unimaginable numbers for a half-day face-to-face event
Previously we would have been delighted to attract around 120 colleagues to our biennial WP conference. After the forced postponement of our April 2020 WP conference (scheduled for a two-day face-to-face event in Milton Keynes) due to COVID, we have planned an online event for this month. Drawing on our experience of online meetings during lockdown, we have structured the normal two- day event across four mornings (15-18 March), each session with a distinctive WP theme:
Like a traditional conference, there will be a keynote speaker introducing each morning’s theme, with a range of seminars, workshops, and lightning talks, but all delivered remotely. We have been inundated with colleagues keen to share their research.
We would normally have had a WP policy perspective at our conference – this time Chris Millward has recorded a short video introduction to each theme. We took the decision to make the remote conference free of charge, and so far 600 delegates have registered across the four days (420 for the opening morning). It has of course required a lot of human resource and technical support to organise the event, but we are excited that so many people across the sector are researching WP, want to share their findings, and want to hear about what others are doing.
I wonder if the future dissemination of WP scholarship will become more democratic and inclusive as a result of the disruption to normal academic life prompted by COVID?
By Emily Dixon, London Programmes & Communications Coordinator, AccessHE
When Professor Sir Peter Scott said, in his keynote on the final day of the OU Biennial Widening Participation conference, how important it is that we note how much less fair rather than more fair society has become, it hit me very hard – even through my laptop screen over zoom. Every day of the conference, I began in the morning being hit by the depth and significance of the access gaps that affect UK universities. Then, over the course of the talks and panels, I would be just struck by the ingenuity, scope and variety of things people are doing about it. The conference as a whole made me think about how big, unwieldy issues get broken down and made comprehensible when we see them as hundreds of small issues, in hundreds of different places, that must be tackled with different approaches.
Attending the conference from AccessHE (an industry body representing twenty-three London HEIs) rather than an individual institution means I was particularly keen for this wide pluralistic spread of different approaches to common issues. I heard about projects as diverse as school outreach to encourage a more diverse cross-section of young people to consider vet science as a career, projects supporting young carers at university and industry mentoring for mature students aspiring to study creative subjects. What struck me most about the wide variety was how small-scale, focused and specific different initiatives in different parts of the country come together to combat something greater than the sum of their parts. In two years’ time at the next conference, the sector will have faced many more and new issues, including some we haven’t even imagined yet, with so much of the longer-term impacts of Covid and Brexit still waiting to be unpicked. I don’t know yet what that will look like, but I’m very excited to see what we manage to achieve between now and then.