-
Archives
- December 2019
- July 2018
- October 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- November 2016
- September 2016
- May 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- November 2015
- October 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- March 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- May 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
-
Meta
Monthly Archives: March 2011
Feedback for excellent students
I’ve heard/read several things recently about the fact that excellent students tend to get less feedback than others. This is perhaps related to the fact that (anecdotally at least) teachers sometimes ignore excellent students – they’ll do OK whatever, so … Continue reading
Posted in adaptive questions, excellent students
Tagged adaptive questions, excellent students
2 Comments
Repeated and blank responses
The figure shown on the left requires a bit of explaining. The three columns represent student responses at 1st, 2nd and 3rd attempt to a short-answer free-text question in formative use. Green represents correct responses; red/orange/yellow respresent incorrect responses. The reason I’ve used different … Continue reading
Posted in e-assessment, student engagement
Tagged blank responses, repeating of responses, student engagement
1 Comment
Can formative-only assignments tell you about student misunderstandings?
When I was doing the original analysis of student responses to Maths for Science assessment questions, I concentrated on questions that had been used summatively and also on questions that required students to input an answer rather than selecting a … Continue reading
More on feedback
Picking up on Silvester’s comment on my previous post…I think it is really important that we stop and think before saying that a student answer to an e-assessment question is wrong because some detail of it is wrong. As with … Continue reading
More about units
OpenMark e-assessment questions were used for the first time in a little 10-credit module called Maths for Science that has been running since 2002. I did some analysis years ago into the mistakes that students make, but I’m about to … Continue reading
Thank you Google translate
As you’ve probably guessed, I’m English, and aside of a pitifully small amount of French, I am ashamed to admit that I don’t speak any other languages. Therefore I think Google translate is wonderful, especially since it enables me to … Continue reading
Units : little things that make a difference
If we start from the premise that we want assessment to encourage and support learning, then one measure of the assessment’s effectiveness is better performance on later summative tasks. Mundeep Gill and Martin Greenhow (Gill, M. and Greenhow, M. (2008) … Continue reading
Learning-oriented and technology-enhanced assessment
My post on ‘Adjectives of assessment’ omitted ‘learning-oriented’, and to be honest it wasn’t until reading this afternoon that I realised what a powerful concept learning-oriented assessment might be. I was reading Keppell, M. and Carless, D. (2006) Learning-oriented assessment: a technology-based case study, … Continue reading
Posted in terminology
Tagged Hong Kong, learning-oriented, technology-enhanced, terminology
Leave a comment