In an increasingly serious world, fun often feels like a guilty pleasure. But what if it’s actually essential? And why are people often afraid to talk about it?
The essential nature of fun is something that OU RUMPUS researchers and Fullscope charities have known for some time. Yet we’ve both found that funders can be reluctant to support ‘fun’ work and research. So, we joined forces, via the FUNdamentals knowledge exchange project, to find out why.
Our research with charities and funders revealed that although fun is considered essential to supporting children and young people (particularly those experiencing challenging circumstances), there’s reluctance to openly discuss fun’s benefits professionally. Why is this? Should we be doing something about it? Are our young people suffering from a fun deficit? Read and share our fun executive summary of The FUNdamentals to find out.
What do you think? Is fun something you can live without? Do you agree with our ‘FUNdamental’ values?
We view fun as a human need, not a luxury.
Fun is integral to supporting children/young people. It is key to building relationships and trust, unlocking potential, enabling constructive risk-taking and learning. This is particularly true for those in challenging circumstances.
Without fun children/young people wouldn’t engage in activities. Therefore, we include fun / enjoyment in the work we do / fund, not just for children/young people but also the adults supporting them.
If you’re interested in talking about the issues raised in the report let us know. And, if you’re interested in how we went about the research read our methods and reflections section below.
Methods: (the geeky bit about what we did and how we did it).
The Research Interviews
Semi-structured interviews (SSIs) were conducted in person, and online with between one and three representatives of each participating organisation. Interview questions were the same with slight tweaks made to reflect charity / funder status. Each interview started by asking what ‘fun’ meant to the participant/s personally. This elicited some interesting responses and contributed to revealing that there appears to be a gap between the actual value of fun and how it’s valued within our society.
Recruitment of charity participants
Charities working with children and young people (CYP) were approached in the East of England and London using a snowball sampling method and included charities in the Fullscope Consortium, our research partners. We sought to represent a typical cross section of small, medium and larger charities. However, some interested smaller charities just didn’t have capacity. Sadly, capacity issues within hard-pressed charities are not unusual and something to be explored (in partnership) to ensure smaller charity voices are represented in research.
Something we didn’t anticipate was one interested small charity (focused on trauma support) that decided that (even though confidentiality was assured), it was too risky to participate in case their interest in fun was construed negatively by funders. This in itself was a finding: it was fascinating to hear that ‘fun’ is such a ‘taboo’ in the sector that you can be dammed by association. Ultimately, we spoke with two small, three medium, and four large charities.
Recruitment of funder participants
We reached out to a cross-section of funders representative of the CYP grant making sector. We also sought representation of different attitudes; identifying funders who may be considered early adopters, reluctant or neutral to the concept of fun in grantmaking. It was harder to secure interviews with funders than charities; many didn’t respond at all, some cited a lack of time, and some a lack of relevance to their priorities. Ultimately, we spoke with seven funders who support CYP work nationally, in London, or/and the East of England. All would probably be considered early adopters, or neutral to the concept of fun in grantmaking.
Children and Young People (CYP) Voice
We hoped that a small group of ‘young advisors’ from Fullscope’s Our Voices network, would offer their insights to ensure CYP voice was kept central. When initially discussing this Fullscope’s youth lead made an interesting point: No-one had ever consulted them on something like ‘fun’ before. CYP voice groups are usually asked about trauma, racism, mental health, etc. All of which are extremely important, but it can seem like CYP are being mined for the negative aspects of their experiences.
This was a really interesting observation. The issue of the commodification of CYP – as part of the process of helping them – was alluded to by several interviewees, both charities and funders. We’re hopeful that the co-produced funds centering CYP joy (mentioned in the report) will shine a light on how this problem can be addressed.
Data analysis
Data analysis was conducted using Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RFA). 60 initial codes were generated and eventually rationalised under six themes (which you can read in the report). An RFA approach encourages the researcher to engage critically with the data and reflect on their own responses, emotions and biases throughout the research process. Which leads me to….
Reflections on conducting this research
Speaking with charities and funders, writing up the research findings, and creating the report, I was conscious that some elements could feel judgmental. Particularly: the gap between how we value fun for ourselves vs others, our connections between the words fun and frivolity, qualifying things as ‘just fun’, and the almost subconscious bias we have of ‘beggars can’t be choosers’ when it comes to who is deserving of fun, and what that can look like. I think it’s important to admit that I’m ‘guilty’ of having thought, said, felt or done these things. Some of which I knew prior to starting this research, and some of which became apparent as I was conducting it and reflecting on my own responses to the data.
For example, when talking with a charity who openly position themselves as ‘fun’, they mentioned their work with domestic violence survivors and I caught myself thinking ‘oh wow, they do so much more than just fun’. So, I effectively dismissed the value of fun itself compared to a more ‘serious topic, despite my long-held belief in its importance, and having incorporated it into my own (serious) work for decades.
Despite having experienced / seen the benefits of fun from various perspectives (as a CYP being supported myself, leading CYP programmes for a charity, devising and managing CYP funds, and working on CYP policy (with a small p)).
Despite actively educating myself on the value of fun and advocating for it to be taken seriously by others.
Despite ALL the above, this mental process still happened to me many times throughout the research, and on reflection many times in the past. I highlight this to underline how deeply seated the problem of how we value fun is. There’s no judgement intended. Just an intention to bring these issues to awareness so we can explore what to do with them.
And finally…
We hope you enjoy reading the report. If you do, please share with your networks, and anyone who could do with a little fun. I’ll leave you with the words of our outstanding charity partner and of the RUMPUS leads.
“Working with The Open University helped us articulate something we’ve always known instinctively that fun is fundamental to wellbeing and connection. This project validated our experiences and gave us language and evidence to champion fun as a serious and essential ingredient in creating positive change”. Eva Acs, Director, Fullscope
“As Open University researchers we’ve often had experience of funding application feedback that is nervous about fun. Working with Fullscope has been a fantastic opportunity, opening doors to understanding attitudes (but also fears) about fun and finding positive routes through. This report points us forward to more fun and creative collaborations”. Mimi Tatlow-Golden, Professor of Interdisciplinary Studies of Childhood and Youth


Image 1: Howard Gardner, Alexandra Okada and Tony Sherborne at The Open University UK
Image 2 Alexandra Okada and David Perkins at Harvard University, USA
Image 3: Project Zero Team – Educating with the world in mind as well as “heart and soul!”
Image 1: Dr. Okada and Dr. Valente at the MIT Media Lab – Lifelong Kindergarten
Image 1: UNESCO – Digital Learning Week: AI and the Future of Education 










